<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.1.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rule 5 Draft Review</title>
	<link>http://farmauthority.dcsportsnet.com/2005/12/09/rule-5-draft-review/</link>
	<description>We cannot always build the future for our youth, but we can build our youth for the future - FDR</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 21:04:02 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Scott M. Collins</title>
		<link>http://farmauthority.dcsportsnet.com/2005/12/09/rule-5-draft-review/#comment-212</link>
		<author>Scott M. Collins</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2005 17:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://farmauthority.dcsportsnet.com/2005/12/09/rule-5-draft-review/#comment-212</guid>
					<description>&lt;p&gt;So since Booker was taken in the Major League portion of the draft, the Phillies have to keep him on their Major league roster all year ala 2005 Tony Blanco, right?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So since Booker was taken in the Major League portion of the draft, the Phillies have to keep him on their Major league roster all year ala 2005 Tony Blanco, right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yuda</title>
		<link>http://farmauthority.dcsportsnet.com/2005/12/09/rule-5-draft-review/#comment-213</link>
		<author>Yuda</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2005 17:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://farmauthority.dcsportsnet.com/2005/12/09/rule-5-draft-review/#comment-213</guid>
					<description>&lt;p&gt;Josh Perrault was considered a prospect at one point, wasn't he?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Not saying we should expect anything, but it's a nice reminder that being a hot prospect doesn't actually mean much most of the time.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Josh Perrault was considered a prospect at one point, wasn&#8217;t he?</p>
<p>Not saying we should expect anything, but it&#8217;s a nice reminder that being a hot prospect doesn&#8217;t actually mean much most of the time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://farmauthority.dcsportsnet.com/2005/12/09/rule-5-draft-review/#comment-214</link>
		<author>Anonymous</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2005 22:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://farmauthority.dcsportsnet.com/2005/12/09/rule-5-draft-review/#comment-214</guid>
					<description>&lt;p&gt;Never heard of him, but Booker looks good on paper.  His BB/9 is really high, but his other numbers look really good.  Why are you so down on him?  He (again, on paper) looks like he could be a great addtion to the pen.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;-Brian at BSM&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Never heard of him, but Booker looks good on paper.  His BB/9 is really high, but his other numbers look really good.  Why are you so down on him?  He (again, on paper) looks like he could be a great addtion to the pen.</p>
<p>-Brian at BSM</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
