Comments on: Washington Nationals Organizational Big Board http://farmauthority.dcsportsnet.com/2005/12/16/washington-nationals-organizational-big-board/ We cannot always build the future for our youth, but we can build our youth for the future - FDR Tue, 02 Dec 2008 00:57:56 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1.3 By: Anonymous http://farmauthority.dcsportsnet.com/2005/12/16/washington-nationals-organizational-big-board/#comment-217 Anonymous Sat, 17 Dec 2005 18:06:00 +0000 http://farmauthority.dcsportsnet.com/2005/12/16/washington-nationals-organizational-big-board/#comment-217 <p>Where is the link to the "Big Board"? Am anxious to see it!!!</p> Where is the link to the “Big Board”? Am anxious to see it!!!

]]> By: Yuda http://farmauthority.dcsportsnet.com/2005/12/16/washington-nationals-organizational-big-board/#comment-218 Yuda Sat, 17 Dec 2005 20:30:00 +0000 http://farmauthority.dcsportsnet.com/2005/12/16/washington-nationals-organizational-big-board/#comment-218 <p><a HREF="http://yuda.org/Nats_Org.htm" rel="nofollow">The Big Board's temporary home.</A></p> The Big Board’s temporary home.

]]> By: The Don Wood Files http://farmauthority.dcsportsnet.com/2005/12/16/washington-nationals-organizational-big-board/#comment-219 The Don Wood Files Sun, 18 Dec 2005 00:42:00 +0000 http://farmauthority.dcsportsnet.com/2005/12/16/washington-nationals-organizational-big-board/#comment-219 <p>Looks great! Well-done.</p> Looks great! Well-done.

]]> By: Brian http://farmauthority.dcsportsnet.com/2005/12/16/washington-nationals-organizational-big-board/#comment-220 Brian Sun, 18 Dec 2005 16:59:00 +0000 http://farmauthority.dcsportsnet.com/2005/12/16/washington-nationals-organizational-big-board/#comment-220 <p>Thanks Yuda</p> Thanks Yuda

]]> By: Anonymous http://farmauthority.dcsportsnet.com/2005/12/16/washington-nationals-organizational-big-board/#comment-221 Anonymous Sun, 18 Dec 2005 23:47:00 +0000 http://farmauthority.dcsportsnet.com/2005/12/16/washington-nationals-organizational-big-board/#comment-221 <p>Why is the big board flawed, Ben Cox was traded, Where is soto, sandora, german, belcher, thats just the catchers. many of the players on the board are no longer with the orginization. Nice work anyway</p> Why is the big board flawed, Ben Cox was traded, Where is soto, sandora, german, belcher, thats just the catchers. many of the players on the board are no longer with the orginization. Nice work anyway

]]> By: Scott M. Collins http://farmauthority.dcsportsnet.com/2005/12/16/washington-nationals-organizational-big-board/#comment-222 Scott M. Collins Mon, 19 Dec 2005 16:50:00 +0000 http://farmauthority.dcsportsnet.com/2005/12/16/washington-nationals-organizational-big-board/#comment-222 <p>Anon #2: Thank you for your questions and the tip on Ben Cox - I didn't notice that. As for the other players you mentioned, the GCL level players are notoriously hard to project and as previously stated, the Big Board will be a lot clearer once the seasons start and rosters are set.</p> <p>I didn't realize Soto had 30 ABs, but I left him off because he only pitched 1.2 innings. Sandora had 20 total ABs and if he is on a roster in the spring, he will of course be added. German had 13 total ABs - same thing as Sandora. Belcher is listed as an OF with Potomac because we've got a few too many catchers and he played outfield recently.</p> <p>If you see other inaccuracies in the future, feel free to critique.</p> Anon #2: Thank you for your questions and the tip on Ben Cox - I didn’t notice that. As for the other players you mentioned, the GCL level players are notoriously hard to project and as previously stated, the Big Board will be a lot clearer once the seasons start and rosters are set.

I didn’t realize Soto had 30 ABs, but I left him off because he only pitched 1.2 innings. Sandora had 20 total ABs and if he is on a roster in the spring, he will of course be added. German had 13 total ABs - same thing as Sandora. Belcher is listed as an OF with Potomac because we’ve got a few too many catchers and he played outfield recently.

If you see other inaccuracies in the future, feel free to critique.

]]> By: Greg Pultorak http://farmauthority.dcsportsnet.com/2005/12/16/washington-nationals-organizational-big-board/#comment-223 Greg Pultorak Mon, 19 Dec 2005 17:05:00 +0000 http://farmauthority.dcsportsnet.com/2005/12/16/washington-nationals-organizational-big-board/#comment-223 <p>Just out of curiosity - Where is this year's 4th rounder - Justn Maxwell?</p> Just out of curiosity - Where is this year’s 4th rounder - Justn Maxwell?

]]> By: Scott M. Collins http://farmauthority.dcsportsnet.com/2005/12/16/washington-nationals-organizational-big-board/#comment-224 Scott M. Collins Mon, 19 Dec 2005 17:29:00 +0000 http://farmauthority.dcsportsnet.com/2005/12/16/washington-nationals-organizational-big-board/#comment-224 <p>Maxwell has been added in the update that corrected for the weekend's moves and some of Anon #2's concerns.</p> Maxwell has been added in the update that corrected for the weekend’s moves and some of Anon #2’s concerns.

]]> By: Anonymous http://farmauthority.dcsportsnet.com/2005/12/16/washington-nationals-organizational-big-board/#comment-225 Anonymous Tue, 20 Dec 2005 03:34:00 +0000 http://farmauthority.dcsportsnet.com/2005/12/16/washington-nationals-organizational-big-board/#comment-225 <p>Great!!! I really like the format and it will be invaluable to us that like following the "kids" in the minors almost as much as the guys in "the show". Not sure if all the pieces are in their right places, but it is a great start; and, I am sure you will adjust it as moves/plans are made over the next couple of months. Anyway, A standing ovation for the "Nats Big Board".</p> <pre><code> GoTerp(Scout) </code></pre> Great!!! I really like the format and it will be invaluable to us that like following the “kids” in the minors almost as much as the guys in “the show”. Not sure if all the pieces are in their right places, but it is a great start; and, I am sure you will adjust it as moves/plans are made over the next couple of months. Anyway, A standing ovation for the “Nats Big Board”.

     GoTerp(Scout)
]]> By: Anonymous http://farmauthority.dcsportsnet.com/2005/12/16/washington-nationals-organizational-big-board/#comment-226 Anonymous Tue, 20 Dec 2005 17:32:00 +0000 http://farmauthority.dcsportsnet.com/2005/12/16/washington-nationals-organizational-big-board/#comment-226 <p>Muchas Gracias for this - I'll be keeping a very close eye on it as we get towards spring training.</p> <p>One request for a possible addition - any chance that you could add the date the site was last amended (so we can tell how up to date), and (even better, but much more work!) what amendments were made?</p> <p>Cheers!</p> Muchas Gracias for this - I’ll be keeping a very close eye on it as we get towards spring training.

One request for a possible addition - any chance that you could add the date the site was last amended (so we can tell how up to date), and (even better, but much more work!) what amendments were made?

Cheers!

]]>