<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.1.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Almost But Not Quite</title>
	<link>http://farmauthority.dcsportsnet.com/2007/03/28/almost-but-not-quite/</link>
	<description>We cannot always build the future for our youth, but we can build our youth for the future - FDR</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 08:40:57 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Wooden U. Lykteneau</title>
		<link>http://farmauthority.dcsportsnet.com/2007/03/28/almost-but-not-quite/#comment-11533</link>
		<author>Wooden U. Lykteneau</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 12:44:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://farmauthority.dcsportsnet.com/2007/03/28/almost-but-not-quite/#comment-11533</guid>
					<description>&lt;p&gt;Has Boswell not noticed that this strategy has not worked for the Orioles? Ordinarily, I think this guy is a worthy successor, but this is lazy writing (notice the chimera about the Braves winning 14 straight titles, when in fact, it was only 11 -- 1995 does not follow 1993 in succession) and completely glosses over, if not ignores the fact that the Nationals farm system was essentially on autopilot from 2002 to 2006.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Has Boswell not noticed that this strategy has not worked for the Orioles? Ordinarily, I think this guy is a worthy successor, but this is lazy writing (notice the chimera about the Braves winning 14 straight titles, when in fact, it was only 11 &#8212; 1995 does not follow 1993 in succession) and completely glosses over, if not ignores the fact that the Nationals farm system was essentially on autopilot from 2002 to 2006.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wooden U. Lykteneau</title>
		<link>http://farmauthority.dcsportsnet.com/2007/03/28/almost-but-not-quite/#comment-11534</link>
		<author>Wooden U. Lykteneau</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 12:50:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://farmauthority.dcsportsnet.com/2007/03/28/almost-but-not-quite/#comment-11534</guid>
					<description>&lt;p&gt;[to the likes of Roger Kahn and Roger Angell]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[to the likes of Roger Kahn and Roger Angell]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VladiHondo</title>
		<link>http://farmauthority.dcsportsnet.com/2007/03/28/almost-but-not-quite/#comment-11555</link>
		<author>VladiHondo</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 16:23:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://farmauthority.dcsportsnet.com/2007/03/28/almost-but-not-quite/#comment-11555</guid>
					<description>&lt;p&gt;Couldn't agree more, I am definately going to Hagerstown to see Marrero and Esmailyn play, and am looking forward to seeing the rest of that team, too.  Harrisburg would also be a good weekend trip, want to see the ballpark on the island.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Couldn&#8217;t agree more, I am definately going to Hagerstown to see Marrero and Esmailyn play, and am looking forward to seeing the rest of that team, too.  Harrisburg would also be a good weekend trip, want to see the ballpark on the island.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://farmauthority.dcsportsnet.com/2007/03/28/almost-but-not-quite/#comment-11684</link>
		<author>Tom</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 18:30:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://farmauthority.dcsportsnet.com/2007/03/28/almost-but-not-quite/#comment-11684</guid>
					<description>&lt;p&gt;When was the last time Boswell was seen in a minor league ballpark?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When was the last time Boswell was seen in a minor league ballpark?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://farmauthority.dcsportsnet.com/2007/03/28/almost-but-not-quite/#comment-12276</link>
		<author>Jeff</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2007 15:52:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://farmauthority.dcsportsnet.com/2007/03/28/almost-but-not-quite/#comment-12276</guid>
					<description>&lt;p&gt;If Boswell thinks I'm not excited to go down to Hagerstown and watch two of our top young prospects(Marrero &#38; King) play, on a beautiful day, drinking $1 beers, he's crazy as hell...&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Boswell thinks I&#8217;m not excited to go down to Hagerstown and watch two of our top young prospects(Marrero &amp; King) play, on a beautiful day, drinking $1 beers, he&#8217;s crazy as hell&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric H.</title>
		<link>http://farmauthority.dcsportsnet.com/2007/03/28/almost-but-not-quite/#comment-13661</link>
		<author>Eric H.</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Apr 2007 03:00:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://farmauthority.dcsportsnet.com/2007/03/28/almost-but-not-quite/#comment-13661</guid>
					<description>&lt;p&gt;This BOZ piece I frankly found to be very puzzling.  It seems more than intuitively obvious that spending ones way to fielding a competitive team is a fool's game.  Yet this is precisely what BOZ suggests.  I look no further than the Orioles, Yankees of a few years ago, and Mets.  They are forever in a mode of having to pay huge sums to bring in replacement parts and those parts tend to be old.  I find it far preferable to having a strong system and players who are inculcated in "The National's Way" from the time they arrive as youngsters.  Oakland has done it this way and instilled a philosophy in their players from the very beginning.  The Braves do it that way.  The only difference I would suggest is that when our players become free agent eligible THEN spend the big bucks and keep them!  Nothing more infuriating as a fan than following a guy from the draft and through the system, then to stardom, only to see the traitor walk out the door and play for the Yankees...  Look no further than Giambi or Tejada or Zito who bolted Oakland.  Oakland would be a perennial world series team if they could afford to pay their developed talent.  That's where I hope the Nats are different..  That we keep our talent once developed and only use the FA route for some key parts.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This BOZ piece I frankly found to be very puzzling.  It seems more than intuitively obvious that spending ones way to fielding a competitive team is a fool&#8217;s game.  Yet this is precisely what BOZ suggests.  I look no further than the Orioles, Yankees of a few years ago, and Mets.  They are forever in a mode of having to pay huge sums to bring in replacement parts and those parts tend to be old.  I find it far preferable to having a strong system and players who are inculcated in &#8220;The National&#8217;s Way&#8221; from the time they arrive as youngsters.  Oakland has done it this way and instilled a philosophy in their players from the very beginning.  The Braves do it that way.  The only difference I would suggest is that when our players become free agent eligible THEN spend the big bucks and keep them!  Nothing more infuriating as a fan than following a guy from the draft and through the system, then to stardom, only to see the traitor walk out the door and play for the Yankees&#8230;  Look no further than Giambi or Tejada or Zito who bolted Oakland.  Oakland would be a perennial world series team if they could afford to pay their developed talent.  That&#8217;s where I hope the Nats are different..  That we keep our talent once developed and only use the FA route for some key parts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
