The Nationals scouting department is finalizing their watch list for the June 7-8 MLB First Year Player Draft. The Nationals have the following picks to make:
- #6 (Nationals 1st round selection)
- #31 (1st round supplemental for Alfonso Soriano)
- #49 (1st round supplemental for Jose Guillen)
- #68 (Cubs 2nd round selection for Alfonso Soriano)
- #71 (Nationals 2nd round selection)
- #101 (Nationals 3rd round selection)
- add 30 for each subsequent round (131, 161, …)
Over the next couple of weeks, I am going to give my best guess on what the Nationals should do with those first six selections.
#6 - The last time the Nationals picked this high was back in 2005 and that worked out pretty well for them, ending up with Ryan Zimmerman at #4. The options in 2006 might not include a major league ready guy like Zimmerman, but that does not mean there is not a litany of interesting guys available. Early rumors from the experts have the Nationals going after college pitchers like Missouri State LHP Ross Detwiler or possible RHP Max Scherzer, who was drafted by current Nationals Asst GM Mike Rizzo last year when he was in charge of scouting for the Diamondbacks. Aside from Vanderbilt LHP David Price, the options at college pitcher seem pretty comparable from the #2 guy all the way down to the #10 guy. With that thought in mind, there are three guys who if they are there, I would select if I were the Nationals. The long shot is Rick Porcello, a New Jersey RHP who has a mid-90s fastball, solid mid-70s curve, low-80s slider, and a developing changeup. He also come from a part of the country that the Nationals frequently target, New Jersey. Director of Scouting Dana Brown is a Jersey guy and the Nationals have targeted guys like Jason Bergmann and Sean Black from the Garden State. But the chances of Porcello being there at #6 seem long at best. The next guy who is worth serious consideration is Georgia Tech catcher Matt Wieters who is considered by nearly all scouts as the best catching prospect since Joe Mauer. He has the rare combination of above average defense/play calling to go along with a bat that scout believe could generate 30 home runs. The story on Wieters is his representation, Scott Boras. Negotiations are going to be tough and it is almost a certainty that Wieters will command a major league contract to go along with a likely $5M+ bonus. The final option I would consider is a prep third baseman who has shot up on the draft charts this year, Mike Moustakas. Moustakas has a 97 mph fastball on the mound as a pitcher, but it’s his bat that will carry him through the minor leagues. Scouts are impressed with his light tower power and an easily repeatable swing. Much like Wieters, Moustakas is also represented by Boras. It will not take a major league contract to sign the 18-year old Moustakas, but it will likely take a hefty bonus to get him to forgo his scholarship at USC. All that being said, if I were the Nationals, I would select Matt Wieters. Yes, I know the Nationals spent a rule 5 pick on Jesus Flores, but I would not pass up a catcher who has the ceiling of Wieters. If the plan is to rebuild the farm system, nothing would prove the efforts were underway more than selecting arguably the best bat in the draft, deal with a tough negotiator in Boras, and add depth to an area in need of assistance.
#31 - At this point, it is honestly a guessing game what will happen. All teams don’t take simply the best player available. Many teams select based on need or signability. With that in mind (and assuming he is available), I would select LHP Brett Cecil from teh University of Maryland. He entered 2007 as the Terps closer but flashed enough of a third and fourth pitch that he was moved to the weekend rotation and is a consideration as a starting pitcher in professional baseball. He has a low 90s fastball, a high 80s slider, a serviceable curve & change.
#49 - The choice I’d make here is definitely a longshot, but there is enough disagreement among scouts that he could slide to the middle of the supplemental first round. My selection would be prep SS Justin Jackson. Jackson is already a solid defensive middle infielder and if he can fill out, he could develop into a 15HR/15SB type of player.
#68 - Local prep RHP Neil Ramirez would be my choice here. The Kempsville HS righty has a fastball that has been anywhere from the high 80s to the mid-90s and a good curve in the high 70s. He is a work in progress but there is certainly upside to him.
#71 - Cal State Fullerton RHP Wes Roemer. Roemer began the season as a possible mid-first round selection but a stumble out of the gate combined with the fact scouts are worried whether his high-80s fastball will translate could make him available here. He is all about control. Over the last two seasons, Roemer has struck our 260 hitters while walking only 25 in 258IP.
#101 - Prep catcher Danny Rams from Miami, FL. He has a huge power bat and an incredible arm behind the plate. His footwork needs work but he would certainly become one of the top catchers in the organization if he were selected.
I’ll try and do this at least two more times leading up to the draft.
Chris | 22-May-07 at 10:44 pm | Permalink
Great job with the mock draft, I was hoping you guys would do something like this.
I would love to see Rick Porcello at #6, Ive read we want to make a splash this year and meeting his (and Boras) demands would go a long way toward making that true. I’d be really suprised if Weiters was availabe, some sites have him going #1. I think we should take either Porcello or Moustakas, both young guys with extremely high ceilings.
Ive seen Neil Ramirez linked to the Nats on other sites and would like that pick too. Also, both Michael Burgess (think Gary Sheffield) and Wendell Fairley(Carl Crawford) are toolsy outfielders with very hight ceilings and are both late1/sandwich picks.
After the sandwich picks its a crapshoot tho. One player Ive really started ot like is Matt LaPorta, a big power hitting 1B from Florida, something the Nats are in need of but hes more of a mid 1st round pick.
Great job tho, can’t wait for the next one.
Zach | 23-May-07 at 2:21 am | Permalink
Nice job, I truly enjoy reading your blog and the dedication you pour into it.
Here’s a link to a site that has a mock draft of the MLB first round: http://www.mynhldraft.com/2007
I know it says “mynhldraft”, they have multiple mocks for different sports, even professional lacrosse.
It’s currently down until 5 p.m. but in one mock, they had the Nats taking Matt Harvey, I forget what it is now.
Keep up the great work.
Dick | 23-May-07 at 12:02 pm | Permalink
Not sure that Porcello, Wieters OR Moustakas will be left at #6. Would you go with Jason Heyward if those three were gone?
Also, what about Tim Alderson at 31? Good arm, fantastic control, weird delivery.
Louis J. | 23-May-07 at 12:10 pm | Permalink
No way, no how on your mock draft choices. The #6 pick will be for the best college/high school pitcher available. The #31 pick could be another highly rated pitcher or a college hitter (Corey Brown, CF, Oklahoma State)The #49 pick could be a college/high school position player (such as high scholler Nick Noonan, 2B), the #68/#71 picks could be a risky selection of Cole St. Clair, Rice, LH-RP and Kunz, Oregan State, 6-5 and 235lb closer.
Brian J Oliver | 23-May-07 at 12:13 pm | Permalink
Dick - You could very well be correct. If those three are gone (along with Josh Vitters), Heyward could go there as well as Jarrod Parker or Phillippe Aumont. I hope one of the four are available.
As for #31, Alderson is a wild card. I think he is one of those guys who would be better served going to college where he would clarify where he best fits, in the rotation or out of the pen.
Brian J Oliver | 23-May-07 at 12:38 pm | Permalink
Louis - That’s the best part of the whole mock draft hing. Everyone has their own opinions and in the end, we are all likely to be wrong. I am not sold on using the #6 on a college pitcher. There is no college pitcher that stands out to me as a clear #2 or 3. If there are high school arms like Aumont or Parker or Harvey sitting there, I could imagine they’d go with them. But, I’d be interested to see whether the Nationals would pay a premium for a high school arm.
Brown is an intriguing guy, but I think a team may grab him in the #20-25 range. Kyle Russell from Texas could be a gamble as a draft eligible sophomore, assuming the Nationals are ready to pay to make him leave prior to his junior year. If they go with an arm early, a bat here makes sense. In my draft, I grabbed a bat, hence the choice of Cecil there (who also could be off the board in the first round). Aaron Poreda is a sleeper here as well.
At #49, we have entered the “god only knows who will be here zone” Noonan would be a great pick at #49, but I see him going earlier, say the mid-30s. I would clearly take Noonan over Jackson if both were available.
No arguments from me about the merits of St. Clair or Kunz. Both are worthy options but I’d take Neil Ramirez over either of them. And honestly, it’s an equal crapshoot whether St. Clair, Kunz, or Roemer develops so grabbing any of them at #71 seems plausible.
Dick | 23-May-07 at 12:48 pm | Permalink
Brian:
Put you on the spot! Heyward or Aumont?
Brian J Oliver | 23-May-07 at 12:51 pm | Permalink
I’d go with Heyward. I like him as a future 1B or corner OF.
Louis J. | 23-May-07 at 1:57 pm | Permalink
Brian
I had a dream and David Price dropped, like Andy Miller from last year, and became available for the Nationals at #6….The dream depended on the Orioles acting stupid at #5 BUT had Tampa selecting Josh Vitters(3B) they have enough young pitchers and need a hitting 3b; K.C. selecting Rich Porcella (RHP) they would rather pay big money for “young potential”, Cubs taking Matt Wieters (CA) they need him badly; Pirates selecting Mike Moustakas (3B/1B) they have young pitchers but need a 3b; Orioles selecting either Detwiler(LHP)-Moskas(LHP)-Beavan-(RHP)-Parker(RHP)-Bumgarner(LHP) or a position player and the Nationals take David Price who could compete for a staters job in 2008. Will my dream come true?
Brian J Oliver | 23-May-07 at 2:11 pm | Permalink
It’s nice to dream. Isn’t it? ;)
Assuming Tampa goes for a hitter which would be nuts given their lack of pitching depth in the minors. But let’s just say the Rays’ track record with top tier pitchers scares them off of Price. And build on that with your Royals assumption of going younger pitcher since they grabbed Hochevar in 2006. Add to that Cubs grab Wieters because of their recent history with top 5 SPs. I cannot for the life of me believe that the Pirates would pass on Price. The Orioles would also be hard-pressed and as you say idiotic to grab one of thise arms over Price.
I’d place the chances of Price at #6 at about 0.0001%. So there is a chance.
Brian J Oliver | 23-May-07 at 2:38 pm | Permalink
Interestingly enough, both Barry Svrluga and Mark Zuckerman both made similar comments in their chats today regarding the direction they think the Nationals will go with the #6 pick. Both are of the belief that while the public comment is “best available regardless of position”, privately they are targeting best available hitter with the #6 and looking to grab pitchers with one of their next picks.
Chris | 23-May-07 at 3:50 pm | Permalink
I would be shocked if Porcello, Weiters and Moustakas were all gone by #6. I really believe Porcello will be there because I dont think the Royals want to deal with Boras after last year, nor do the Pirates. Everyone has the Orioles looking at college pitchers (Detwiler, Mokas) and I think the Cubs will take Vitters or Weiter. I think the Nats end up with Porcello because I can’t see taking a 3B in the top 10 when your best major league player plays 3B and is only 22.
Brian J Oliver | 23-May-07 at 4:12 pm | Permalink
There is validity to the thought of not taking a HS 3B when Zimmerman seems set there for a long time to come. But, the thing is the Nationals farm system needs depth everywhere. Any talented hitter is worthy of consideration regardless of position. They need to fill out talent everywhere.
I understand the value in building the pitching up but the perception I get from the actions taken in last year’s draft is that the Nationals have their reservations about overpaying for high school pitchers. Willems went for slot but Sean Black went to Seton Hall because the Nationals would not go above it. I’m not sure they are ready to pay $4M+ for a prep arm. The guys there are talented, no question. But if Mike Rizzo’s presence has any say on the happenings, I think it’s going to be a bat.
2002 - 1 Sergio Santos, ss, Mater Dei HS, Hacienda Heights, Calif.
2003 - 1 Conor Jackson 3b U. of California & 1 Carlos Quentin of Stanford U.
2004 - 1 Stephen Drew ss Florida State U.
2005 - 1 Justin Upton ss Great Bridge HS, Chesapeake, Va. & 1S Matt Torra rhp U. of Massachusetts
2006 - 1 Max Scherzer rhp Missouri & 1S Brooks Brown rhp Georgia
Rizzo shied away from the prep school arms early (and typically the D-Backs were picking in the top half of the draft, 2002 withstanding).
I’m not saying the #31 or more likely the #49 won’t be used for a HS arm, I just see the Nationals targeting the best available bat at #6.
Chris | 23-May-07 at 5:37 pm | Permalink
Wow, i didnt realize how many position players Rizzo had taken, that’s a very good point. I still think they will go over slot for the right player, and it seems like Porcello or some of the other HS arms this year would be worth it. Heyward worries me, I’ve seen him on a couple of “Best Chance to be a Bust” lists on other sites. Is there any chance Moustakas could stay at SS?
Jeff | 24-May-07 at 10:19 am | Permalink
6 Jason Heyward
31 Kentrail Davis
49 Brett Cecil
Brian J Oliver | 24-May-07 at 10:23 am | Permalink
Jeff - You like your prep bats. With Marrero, Davis, and Heyward you have the makings of one of interesting potential outfield from left to right, respectively.
Jeff | 24-May-07 at 11:03 am | Permalink
I love Heyward and I can’t see Rizzo/Bowden passing if he’s there at #6…
Kentrail Davis is raw but he packs a big bat for such a compact guy… Extremely athletic…
If we went Heyward and Davis with the first two I’d be ecstatic…
You’re right… Marrero, Heyward, Davis could be potentially awesome…
Jeff | 24-May-07 at 11:20 am | Permalink
P.S. - Vitters won’t drop to #6 but if he did we’ll take him…
Weiters won’t drop to #6…
Unless the Orioles grab Heyward I think he’s ours…
Ryan Sullivan | 24-May-07 at 11:49 am | Permalink
I disagree Jeff, I think Wieters will be there, and we would be foolish to pass on him if he is… I see it going something like this-
1) D. Price
2) R. Porcello
3) J. Vitters
4) M. Moustakas - Pittsburgh won’t mess with Boras
5) R. Detwiler -
6) WIETERS
Ideal world, Price or Porcello drops, otherwise, the choice is between Wieters and Scherzer…
I’d go Wieters at 6, then take pitchers with the next three picks (31, 49, 68) and perhaps a Tony Thomas will be available at 71-
Jeff | 24-May-07 at 11:54 am | Permalink
I think the Cubs love Weiters…
Price
Detwiler
Weiters
Vitters
Aumont
Top 5…
Chris | 24-May-07 at 10:04 pm | Permalink
scout.com had an article saying the cubs were not going to be going over slot based on the amount of money they spent on the big league club last year. They (and a few other I’ve seen) have the Cubs taking Vitters.
I still think Heyward is a real reach at #6 and I would rather see us take Moustakas or a pitcher at 6 and then Burgess or Wendell Fairley at 31. Should be interesting
Jeff | 25-May-07 at 9:29 am | Permalink
Burgess is overrated…
Funny enough… Moustakas is a real reach at #6 to me… No way Nats take him…