<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.1.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Across the Affiliates 06/18/07</title>
	<link>http://farmauthority.dcsportsnet.com/2007/06/18/across-the-affiliates-061807/</link>
	<description>We cannot always build the future for our youth, but we can build our youth for the future - FDR</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 20:25:57 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: BrianH</title>
		<link>http://farmauthority.dcsportsnet.com/2007/06/18/across-the-affiliates-061807/#comment-23011</link>
		<author>BrianH</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2007 21:02:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://farmauthority.dcsportsnet.com/2007/06/18/across-the-affiliates-061807/#comment-23011</guid>
					<description>&lt;p&gt;Brian J Oliver:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Is there any chance the Washington Nationals will call up John Lanaan to pitch in September?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;What is his expected "progress track?"&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brian J Oliver:</p>
<p>Is there any chance the Washington Nationals will call up John Lanaan to pitch in September?</p>
<p>What is his expected &#8220;progress track?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Oliver</title>
		<link>http://farmauthority.dcsportsnet.com/2007/06/18/across-the-affiliates-061807/#comment-23012</link>
		<author>Brian Oliver</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2007 21:14:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://farmauthority.dcsportsnet.com/2007/06/18/across-the-affiliates-061807/#comment-23012</guid>
					<description>&lt;p&gt;Brian - There is always a chance he could be up in September, but the Nationals do not need to add him to the 40-man roster until next year. I'm not sure they'd consider activating his option clock.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brian - There is always a chance he could be up in September, but the Nationals do not need to add him to the 40-man roster until next year. I&#8217;m not sure they&#8217;d consider activating his option clock.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GMo</title>
		<link>http://farmauthority.dcsportsnet.com/2007/06/18/across-the-affiliates-061807/#comment-23014</link>
		<author>GMo</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2007 21:24:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://farmauthority.dcsportsnet.com/2007/06/18/across-the-affiliates-061807/#comment-23014</guid>
					<description>&lt;p&gt;Brian:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Balester, by the way, looked very good yesterday. His four-run inning could/should have been a 1-2-3 inning, but mistakes (partly his own) extended the inning and flustered him just a bit. The first guy reached on a third-strike wild pitch, and the next guy tried a sac bunt that neither he nor catcher John Suomi fielded, so it went for a single. It was one of those "You got it, no, you got it!" plays. Then the third batter grounded out to third. The damage came after that via a hard single and a home run.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Balester has been very impressive all season. While his record doesn't show it, he's had quality stuff in every start.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brian:</p>
<p>Balester, by the way, looked very good yesterday. His four-run inning could/should have been a 1-2-3 inning, but mistakes (partly his own) extended the inning and flustered him just a bit. The first guy reached on a third-strike wild pitch, and the next guy tried a sac bunt that neither he nor catcher John Suomi fielded, so it went for a single. It was one of those &#8220;You got it, no, you got it!&#8221; plays. Then the third batter grounded out to third. The damage came after that via a hard single and a home run.</p>
<p>Balester has been very impressive all season. While his record doesn&#8217;t show it, he&#8217;s had quality stuff in every start.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
