As has been previously reported, the Nationals are adding an additional five players today, now that the minor league season has completed (for everyone except Vermont and the DSL Nationals1). After adding LHSP Matt Chico and RHRP Winston Abreu on Friday, the Nationals are adding 2007 first rounder LHSP Ross Detwiler, 2005 4th rounder CF Justin Maxwell, minor league free agent LHRP Arnie Munoz, minor league free agent RHRP Jon Albaladejo, and CF Ryan Langerhans(they are also activating LHRP Micah Bowie from the 15-day DL). Most people are aware of who Chico, Langerhans and Bowie are so I’ll give the quick recap on the other five players:
- Abreu: The 30-year old Abreu was signed as a minor league free agent by the Nationals after the 2006 season pitching in the Orioles system. He had a less than stellar cup of coffee with the Nationals earlier this season but was dominant in Triple-A Columbus where he put together a great season in relief, going 3-0 with a 1.20ERA and 0.84WHIP over 37 appearances. In 52 1/3 innings, he struck out an impressive 82 hitters while walking 20. Abreu is a righthanded relief pitcher brought in to bridge the game to the setup man/closer.
- Munoz: after spending his entire career in the Chicago White Sox system, the 25-year old Munoz signed with the Nationals as a minor league free agent after the 2006 season. Munoz was the lefthanded compliment to Abreu in Columbus compiling a 3-1 record with a 2.61ERA and 1.20WHIP over 53 appearances (51 1/3IP) with 45 strikeouts and 18 walks. Munoz will be like Ray King, a guy brought into the game to face lefthanded hitters. In Triple-A, he held LH to 179/238/256. Munoz is getting the chance to show the organization whether he worthy of a spot in the organization, perhaps even a role in the bullpen as the lefty specialist.
- Albaladejo: The 24-year old RHRP was drafted by the Pittsburgh Pirates in 2001 out of Puerto Rico. He has a low-90s fastball and was known as a strikeout pitcher in his six years in their organization. Released by the Pirates earlier this season, the Nationals picked him up as a righthanded arm for the Harrisburg bullpen. Over 21 appearances (36 2/3 IP), he didn’t have eye-popping numbers, a 1.23WHIP and 4.17ERA with 35 strikeouts. But given the roster shuffle in the organization, he saw himself thrust into action for the Clippers where his numbers improved. He was 3-0 with a 0.78ERA and 0.83WHIP in 14 appearances (23IP). He struck out 20 while walking seven. He’ll likely be used against righthanded hitters down the stretch, in Columbus, he held RH hitters to 130/203/185. Like with Munoz, the Nationals are trying out Albaladejo to see what he has to offer and whether he is worth retaining in the organization.
- Detwiler: Everyone knows the background on Detwiler. The #6 overall pick in 2007 spent the last month of his professional time in High-A Potomac where he was 2-2 with a 4.22 ERA in five appearances. The 21-year old Detwiler is being brought up to get him some exposure to the major leagues. It’s unlikely that he’ll start any games but will probably get a few innings or at the very least a few batters during the final weeks of the season. There have been questions whether it makes any sense to add Detwiler to the 40-man roster at this point. The most common concern is options and service time. I see no issues with adding him to the roster because as a top 10 draft pick out of college, he’ll need to demonstrate within the four year window (the number of option years he’d have) that he’s ready to perform at a major league level. If he’s not ready to be a full time majorleaguer at that point, there are bigger questions than adding him to the 40-man in his first season as a professional. As for the service time clock, I don’t believe that ~25 days is going to make the difference on whether he becomes a Super Two. In the the best case scenarion, he makes the team out of spring training in 2008 (not a 100% guarantee by any stretch) and not be eligible for salary arbitration until after the 2010 season. And the possibility exists that if he spends a total of roughly a month and a half in the minor leagues over the next three seasons, that arbitration timeline can be bumped out to 2011 (and even further depending upon how much time he actually spends in the minors).
- Maxwell: Of all the promotions, this is probably the more surprising one, the soon-to-be 24-year old former Terp put together an impressive season split between Low-A Hagerstown and High-A Potomac. Combines, Maxwell hit 281/363/533 with 27 home runs, 85 RBI and 35/43 stolen bases. It seems the Nationals want to see what he can do when exposed to major league pitching. He’s likely to only see spot duty as a late inning pinch-hitter/defensive replacement though he may get a start here and there. The issue of options and service time come up again with Maxwell, though similar to Detwiler there are some reasonable explanations. Maxwell is older than the level he played at this season and if he is to be a part of the Nationals future, he’ll need to make his move soon as his age will quickly move him out of the “prospect” discussion. The Nationals willhave options on him for 2008 through 2011, or when he is 24 through 27 years of age. The Nationals would likely know by that point whether he is ready to be a major league regular and the concern with options would not be a problem. As for the service time, he’s in the same boat as Detwiler again where careful roster placement can push off his arbitration years until 2011 or beyond (more likely the beyond).
Tofu Dog | 04-Sep-07 at 9:19 am | Permalink
Could you explain the options requirements for minor league players? How may callups? and what are the age stipulations for them that you allude to?
Brian Oliver | 04-Sep-07 at 9:26 am | Permalink
Options: Borrowing from Cot’s Contreact site … An option (optional assignment) allows a club to move a player on its 40-man roster to and from the minor-leagues without exposing him to the other 29 teams.
After 4 or 5 years as a professional, a player must be added to his club’s 40-man roster or exposed to the 29 other clubs in the Rule 5 draft. (A club has 5 years to evaluate a player who signs his first pro contract at 18 years old or younger, but only 4 years to decide on a player who signs at age 19.) For purposes of calculating years as a pro, the counting begins the day a player signs his first pro contract, not the season he begins to play.
When a player is added to the 40-man roster, his club has three “options,” or three separate seasons during which the club may to move him to and from the minor leagues without exposing him to other clubs. A player on the 40-man roster playing in the minors is on optional assignment, and within an option season, there is no limit on the number of times a club may demote and recall a player. However, a player optioned to the minor leagues may not be recalled for at least 10 days, unless the club places a Major League player on the disabled list during the 10-day window.
After three options are exhausted, the player is out of options. Beginning with the next season, he must clear waivers before he may be sent to the minors again.
If a player is not sent to the minors during a year, an option is not used.
If a player is on the 40-man roster in spring training but optioned to the minors before the season begins, an option is used.
If a player’s optional assignment(s) to the minors total less than 20 days in one season, an option is not used.
A player may be eligible for a fourth option year if he has been optioned in three seasons but does not yet have five full seasons of professional experience. A full season is defined as being on an active pro roster for at least 90 days in a season. (If a player is put on the disabled list after earning 60 or more days of service in a single season, his time on the DL is counted.)
Ed | 04-Sep-07 at 9:33 am | Permalink
Brian,
What is your take on Balester and Whitesell? Why were they not called up?
Balester and Detwiler are the same age, but Balester has more professional experience.
On Whitesell, he may be a marginal prospect and all that, but the Nats could use a decent bat. Whitesell has a nice OBA of .425 with good power. With all the new relief pitchers, you can see some PH opportunities. You see conflicting reports on his defensive abilities.
Maybe they will be called up later?
Brian Oliver | 04-Sep-07 at 9:35 am | Permalink
Ages/Level … roughly a player is considered a prospect if he is the following age at a level:
drafted out of college
AAA: 23-24 years old
AA: 22-23
High A: 21-22
Low A: 20-21
drafted out of high school
AAA: 22-24
AA: 20-23
High A: 19-21
Low A: 18-20
You can fudge around the margins on those ranges.
Brian Oliver | 04-Sep-07 at 9:37 am | Permalink
Ed - Balester, I believe is an innings thing. He’s thrown more innings this season than ever before. I think they are protecting his arm. As for Whitesell, I agree and am actually disappointed that he didn’t get a look. He seems to made a case for at the very least a look and the fact he didn’t get one is telling for his future (or lack thereof) with the Nationals.
Scott | 04-Sep-07 at 9:51 am | Permalink
Brian - I know this has nothing to do with the farm system, but do you know why installation of the seats at the new stadium has slowed to a crawl? Over the last two weeks or so, very few new seats have been installed. (Even though the Nats TV commentators keep saying the seats are in and numbered.)
A DC Wonk | 04-Sep-07 at 9:57 am | Permalink
If I recall correctly, Billy-Bean-Money-Ball makes the case that the best predictor of major league success is how they do at AAA.
Am I just imagining it, or does it seem that the Nats have a number of solid AAA guys that have terrible records in the bigs. Levaile Speigner, Winston Abreu, Larry Broadway, Jiminez (.368 at Columbus!) etc. Anyone have any thoughts on that?
(And, as a separate issue: why not just get rid of Brandon Watson if they’re never going to give him a fair shot. After all, he “only” batted .313 at AAA this year, 2d on the team to Jiminez. No matter how many times it’s explained to me, I’ll never understand why Langerhans got such a long look (and another call up this week), while Watson is a AAA star. Yeah, yeah, he “only” hits singles and has a bad OBP, but it’s higher than anyone on the Nats other than Young and Batista).
Brian Oliver | 04-Sep-07 at 10:04 am | Permalink
Scott - I’m really not sure. I highly recommend that you check out and ask JD over at JDland. She is by far the subject matter expert on all things new ballpark related.
Maximus | 04-Sep-07 at 10:06 am | Permalink
“If a player’s optional assignment(s) to the minors total less than 20 days in one season, an option is not used.”
Does this apply to Chico? Did we burn an option year on Chico this season?
Brian Oliver | 04-Sep-07 at 10:11 am | Permalink
Max - Chico was sent down on August 17 and recalled on September 1, that’s only 15 days so by definition, no option was used.
Brian Oliver | 04-Sep-07 at 10:17 am | Permalink
DCW - Watson is hurt/on the DL in Columbus with a strained right knee. Though I still think he’s probably not in the Nats long term plans.
Suns Fan | 04-Sep-07 at 10:22 am | Permalink
I went to the Nats game on Sunday. Chico pitched really well.
Kevin (Fairfax) | 04-Sep-07 at 11:04 am | Permalink
Given how poorly Robert Fick has hit this year, I still would have liked to see Larry Broadway get a call, if not Whitsell.
Tofu Dog | 04-Sep-07 at 11:14 am | Permalink
Thanks for the contract info. It will be very helpful. I see Detwiler now has three years/options to make it as a permanent member of the team. That would allow him a year of seasoning at Harrisburg/Columbus in 08 and another in 09 if necessary. I assume 07 would count as one year or at least a part year and therefore he has until his signing date in 2010 before his options run out–he has to be a big league regular in DC? Is that correct?
Brian Oliver | 04-Sep-07 at 11:24 am | Permalink
Detwiler actually has four option years since he will not have five years of service time when that traditional third option year is up. 2008 - first option (2nd pro year); 2009 - second option (3 yrs); 2010 - third option (4th year); 2011 - fourth option ….
Suns Fan | 04-Sep-07 at 11:29 am | Permalink
So the Nats really aren’t losing anything by promoting him? Interesting. From the stand point of a minor league fan, I’m not really sure that I like giving guy’s a guaranteed cup of coffee in their contracts. I think trips to the majors should be earned. I haven’t seen Detwiler, so I can’t judge. But if it really isn’t costing the Nationals anything other than one month of big league salary, then I guess it doesn’t really matter.
Will | 04-Sep-07 at 11:42 am | Permalink
My guess on why Whitesell was not called up is due to his back injury. He played hurt most of the second half of this season. After watching him play 3 of the last 4 games it was pretty obvious that he is still in pain (mostly obvious when he was running the bases). His numbers were good this season and his defense was greatly improved (EL best defensive 1st baseman award). If he was healthy I think he would have been called up. They might let him rest and invite him to the Nats spring training.
Brian Oliver | 04-Sep-07 at 11:45 am | Permalink
SF - and if the Nationals game his promotion right next year, they can avoid Super Two once he sticks. The rough rule of thumb is if you wait until after May 1 to bring a player up, you can more often than not come in just under the Super Two threshold (assuming the player sticks from the point they are promoted). This means the Nationals might have to wait until June 1 before promoting Detwiler in 2008 (adding the 25 days he’ll get this year).
Tofu Dog | 04-Sep-07 at 12:02 pm | Permalink
On Whitesell, I had the privledge to sit next to Mike O’Connor’s dad at a game recently. He had good things to say about Whitesell, whom his son had been playing with at Harrisburg. If Nick Johnson’s career is really impacted by the leg fracture as has been speculated, then Whitesell may be a better option as a backup to Dimitri Young than Broadway.
Louis J. | 04-Sep-07 at 12:03 pm | Permalink
Kevin
Since Manny only carries 5 bench players (instead of 6), bench players who can play more than one position are important to him. Broadway and Whitesell are strickly first basemen. Fick provides Manny with another catcher, first baseman and outfielder plus he’s a great “clubhouse guy”. But his lack of hitting is a concern which may have them looking for another versatile player. A factor to be evaluated is: was Fick’s poor hitting performance a result of his distraction concerning his mother’s illness and subsequent death (he was travelling back to California during the season on some off days to be with his mother).
estuartj | 04-Sep-07 at 12:27 pm | Permalink
Unfortunately for Josh Whitesell the fact that he 1. Didn’t get a call-up (despite a need at the MLB level), 2. Didn’t get invited to the fall instructional league and 3. That Jim Bowden hasn’t mentioned him in any discussions with Barry S. from NJ all combine to paint a picture of a guy the organization doesn’t believe will ever be a contributer on the major league roster.
I wonder if Bowden puts too much stock in “his player” be they draftees with the nats, or guys he drafted in Cincy and doesn’t “like” guys he didn’t bring in?
Louis J. | 04-Sep-07 at 5:11 pm | Permalink
estuartj
While I believe, in general, that Jim Bowden has done a good job since the Lerners became the new owners, I believe he is bias against the players who were before him and has convinced management that MLB has done a poor job of drafting during the 5 years that MLB owned the team. A good example was Valentino “Val” Pascucci who was drafted in 1999 out of Univ. of Oklahoma as a power hitting OF. He had a great 5 year minor league career but at the peak of his career, he was released in Dec,2004 when the Expos traded for Jose Guillen. In 2007, he’s playing for the Marlins AAA team after playing 2005-2006 in Japan and his stats are 132 games, 284-389-577 with 34 HR & 27 doubles. If Bill Beane’s theory of AAA being a good sign of a players potential, Bowden ignored Pascucci’s stats and his power hitting potential because he was with Expos before him.
The system that needed to develop young power hitters, let another escape.
Benji | 04-Sep-07 at 6:52 pm | Permalink
I think the Nats are going to try and ride Whitesell’s trade value this offseason. They may not think he can be successful at the MLB level and want teams to only see his AA stats, which are great. If not with the Nats, I hope we can at least land us a good player