Pitching, pitching, pitching. It’s a mantra that Nationals GM Jim Bowden has repeated time and time again since joining the team in the winter of 2004. While the Nationals have managed to find a few serviceable arms from within, starting pitchers like Shawn Hill and Jason Bergmann, the organizational depth on the mound has been a weakness throughout MLB’s stewardship of the Expos. That appears to be changing and the 2007 Lake Monsters are the first indicator that the right steps are underway to rebuild the player development system. Vermont’s starting rotation featured no fewer than five arms that have a good chance of developing into future major leaguers. This stable of strong arms led Vermont to a 38-37 record, one of only three Nationals affiliates with an above 0.500 record (DSL Nationals1 and Potomac were the others).
STATISTICS
Hitting
| Team | AB | R | H | HR | BB | SO | BA | OBP | SLG | OPS | SB |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vermont | 2396 | 330 | 588 | 31 | 257 | 558 | 245 | 332 | 343 | 675 | 107 |
| NY-PA Avg | 2468 | 340 | 625 | 37 | 253 | 564 | 253 | 332 | 365 | 697 | 76 |
Pitching
| Team | IP | ERA | WHIP | BA | OPS | BAbip | K/9 | BB/9 | K/BB | HR/9 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vermont | 635 | 3.83 | 1.38 | 237 | 662 | 301 | 8.6 | 4.5 | 1.9 | 0.5 |
| NY-PA Avg | 646 | 3.89 | 1.36 | 253 | 691 | 311 | 7.9 | 3.5 | 2.2 | 0.5 |
The Lake Monsters rode their strong pitching to thirty-eight victories. 2006 1st & 4th rounders Colton Willems & Glenn Gibson and 2007 2nd & 8th rounders Jordan Zimmermann & Adrian Alaniz spearheaded the strong staff of starters. The four combined for twenty of the team’s thirty-eight wins with a 2.03ERA, 1.11WHIP, 8.7 K/9, and 3.3 K/BB. Not to be completely outdone by the starters, 2007 draft picks Martin Beno (36th rd), Caleb Staudt (39th), and Luke Pisker (17th) who combined for three wins and three saves over 53 total appearances (79IP) with a 3.08ERA, 1.06WHIP, a sub-0.200 Opponents BA, and 10.5K/9.
Offensively, the Monsters were below average in hitting for average and power but reached base on an average basis and when they did, led the New York/Penn League in stolen bases with 107. Boomer Whiting led the way with 37/42 stolen bases while Garrett Bass (16/20), Mark Gildea (16/23), and Dan Lyons (17/20) helped Vermont generate a nearly league average number runs despite their below average hitting.
| Team | Hit | Pit |
|---|---|---|
| Vermont | 21.7 | 20.9 |
| NY-PA Avg | 21.4 | 21.6 |
It appeared that the Nationals utilized the 2007 draft as a means of repopulating the lower level of the minor leagues with new blood from the college ranks. In previous two seasons, the Nationals signed only 49 total players, requiring them to fill several of their roster spots in Vermont with older players. The New York/Penn League limits rostters to no more than four players who are 23 or older, and no more than three players on active list may have four or more years of prior service. In previous seasons, the Nationals were typically right around those maximums, filling in spots with older and more experienced players. This past season, the Nationals signed 39 players alone and of those only CA Sean Rooney was a regular starter from a previous draft class.
It seems the Nationals have made the effort to assemble a population of future organizational players, allowing them to scale back their reliance on the six-year free agents going forward. In 2007, both Hagerstown and Potomac featured many players who would be classified as too old for the league they were in and the direction taken in this year’s draft should allow the Nationals to stabilize their A-ball rosters with relatively younger players who are under the team’s control for four years. This is not to be taken too lightly as the Nationals are now able to develop a “Nationals way” of player development that should permit them more consistent instruction up the player development ladder.
Regular Lineup
| HIT | (based on # GS) |
|---|---|
| CA | Sean Rooney, 21 |
| 1B | Bill Rhinehart, 22 |
| 2B | Jake Rogers, 23 |
| 3B | Anthony Benner, 20 |
| SS | Dan Lyons, 22 |
| LF | Boomer Whiting, 24 |
| CF | Mark Gildea, 21 |
| RF | Aaron Seuss,22 |
| DH | Garrett Bass, 22 |
| BENCH | |
| CA | Craig Stinson, 23 |
| UTIL | Jean Alvarez, 20 |
| UTIL | Jonathan Martinez, 22 |
| 2B | Stephen King, 19 |
| CF | Stephen Englund, 19 |
| RF | Michael Burgess, 18 |
| PIT | (based on # GS) |
| SP | Hassan Pena, 22 |
| SP | Cole Kimball, 21 |
| SP | Colton Willems, 18 |
| SP | Glenn Gibson, 19* |
| SP | Jordan Zimmermann, 21 |
| SP | Adrian Alaniz, 23 |
| other | Josh Smoker, 18 |
| other | Jack McGeary, 18 |
| RP | Martin Beno, 20 |
| RP | Ryan Harrison, 20 |
| RP | Caleb Staudt, 20 |
| RP | Luke Pisker, 21 |
| RP | Edulin Abreu, 22 |
| RP | Devin Drag, 23 |
| RP | Ryan Buchter, 20* |
| CL | Alberto Tavarez, 23 |
‘*’ = lefthanded pitcher
As explained above, the Monsters featured an everyday lineup of 2007 draft picks who were likely selected because they fit the mold of what the Nationals future of player development is going to be. From a quick scan of their individual statistics, the Nationals have seemingly focused on plate discipline/pitch identification from their hitters. After last year’s performance where the team batted a collective 233/296/311 with only 186 walks and 611 strikeouts, the 2007 team moved up to league average with a 245/332/343 while increasing their number of walks (257) and reducing their number of strkeouts (558).
Top 10 Vermont Lake Monsters Prospects
- Colton Willems RHSP
- Josh Smoker LHSP
- Jack McGeary LHSP
- Jordan Zimmermann RHSP
- Glenn Gibson LHSP
- Adrian Alaniz RHSP
- Bill Rhinehart 1B
- Mark Gildea CF
- Garrett Bass LF/RF
- Boomer Whiting LF/CF
Note: RF Michael Burgess, CF Stephen Englund, and 2B/SS Stephen King were not included on this list given their inclusion on the GCL roster. If these players were slotted among the top 10 list here, Burgess would be the #1 and Englund and King would slide in between Gibson and Alaniz at #6 and 7 respectively.
Willems had an inconsistent season but remains the most projectable of the arms in Vermont. From reports, the Nationals have tinkered with Willems’ delivery in order to allow him to more easily repeat his delivery. If this is the case, it will bear watching whether he can adapt to the changes and regain the fastball velocity he had (mid-90s) while at the same time gain more command on his secondary pitches (a curve and slider). Willems is the definition of high risk/high reward. Of all of the pitchers in the Nationals organization, he is the most likely to develop into the frontline #1 starter that the Nationals need to develop. I’d expect the Nationals to pair him with Gibson in Hagerstown to begin the 2008 season with the chance of a promotion to Potomac if the results dictate.
Smoker is intriguing to me. Scouting reports say he used six pitches while he was in high school (three different fastballs, curve, slider & change). His fastball has been clocked up to 94mph, his curveball is hard on even the righthanded hitters, and he uses his splitter as a strikeout pitch. He projects as a #2-3 starting pitcher but given his tenacity he is the type of pitcher major league teams love to have as anchors in their rotations. Given his late signing and limited playing time, a return to Vermont in 2008 is likely.
McGeary was the surprise get form the 2007 draft. Like Smoker, he’s a lefthander that projects out well, likely as a middle of the rotation starting pitcher (#2 or 3). Unlike Smoker, McGeary isn’t a power pitcher, his strength is his command. He has a low-90s fastball and low-80s breaking pitch. He has drawn comparisons to both Andy Pettitte and Tom Glavine and the Nationals should be happy if he turns into half of that. McGeary signed an unusual contract that allows him to attend Stanford and take classes, meaning his 2008 debut is likely in Vermont once his semester ends (likely missing the first couple weeks of the NY/Penn League season).
Zimmermann touched the mid-90s in the 2006 summer league, vaulting the Division III righthander onto the map for the 2007 draft. He has three solid pitches already (fastball, change, and slider) with a developing curveball. It’s going to get redundant but like the previous two arms, Zimmermann projects out as a #2-3 starting pitcher. He appears likely to start 2008 in Potomac.
Gibson was the story of the early part of the season for the Monsters as he baffled teams with his plus curveball. His curve along with his changeup are already above average. His fastball sits in the high-80s/low-90s but he might be able to add a couple of mph as he fills out. Gibson has the looks of a middle of the rotation starting pitcher and it would not surprise me to see the Nationals push him quickly though he is likely to begin 2008 in Hagerstown. Along with Ross Detwiler, Smoker, and McGeary, the Nationals have assembled for themselves four very promising lefthanded starting pitchers.
Add another pitcher to the docket for the Nationals, Alaniz will never be mistaken for a dominating power pitcher. He gets by on his impressive command and guile. His fastball sits in the high-80s and he has a solid curveball. What allows Alaniz to succeed is his control. He seems most likely to develop into a back of the rotation starter but every major league team needs a reserve of those. Expect Alaniz to start 2008 in Potomac with Zimmermann.
Finally. A bat. Bill Rhinehart made himself known from day one in Vermont, driving in runs at a spectacular rate, thirteen RBI in his first twelve games. His bat is his calling card though he likely has the ceiling of a major league reserve. He played 1B for Vermont in 2007 but don’t be surprised if the Nationals try him out as a corner outfielder in 2008. Depending upon how the roster depth shakes out, Rhinehart could start out next season as high as Harrisburg though Potomac seems more reasonable.
Gildea was a ninth round selection as a draft eligible sophomore and the Nationals got him signed, a nice haul for that part of the draft. Gildea projects well as a center fielder. He has above average speed, knows how to work the count, and has line-drive power that could develop into home runs. He is not flashy, just a solid performer. If you were to ask me for a sleeper prospect, it would be Gildea. Expect him to start 2008 in centerfield for Potomac.
Bass, the son of former major leaguer, Kevin Bass, was grabbed in the 42nd round but put up extrabase numbers well beyond a 42nd round selection with 23 XBH out of 58 total. He played almost the entire season as the Monsters DH and is corner outfielder if he plays the field. Bass has the baseball genes though he likely is a #4 outfielder as a ceiling. given his age (22) it would be best for him to start 2008 in Potomac as corner outfielder/designated hitter.
Whiting’s calling card is his speed. He ran the 60 in 6.3 seconds and led the NCAA with 69 stolen bases in 2007. He has solid insticts defensively in CF though his arm is below average. He is a fun player to watch given his ability to manufacture runs on his own. I would expect a debut in Hagerstown in 2008.
Tofu Dog | 24-Sep-07 at 11:40 am | Permalink
On the top ten, I would respectfully disagree. If the rating is based on the league then weighting so heavily for ultimate potential undercuts the rationale for rating by league. Smoker and McGeary hardly pitched and when they did they were ineffective, so to rate them more highly than Jordan Zimmerman who was one of the top pitchers in the league seems questionable. Zimmerman is older than the two high school pitchers and while McGeary and Smoker may have more upside, the differences going into the draft were not that significant. So I would go with performance over scouting reports that may or may not bear fruit. I think the same argument could be made for Gibson. Your rating seems to correlate exactly with where they were taken in the draft. Willems came out of a pretty weak draft so to rate him so highly when his numbers show several notable weaknesses, also seems questionable. Potential makes sense in an overall rating of the Nationals system, but league by league not so much.
Brian Oliver | 24-Sep-07 at 11:46 am | Permalink
The rating is based more on the future than on what they did in one calendar year. If you want to see who performed best for the Monsters, you can look at the statistics for that. Smoker and McGeary are included here because they would not appear anywhere else otherwise.
And realistically at this point, any ranking is merely a guess even if you include stats. Until players get a couple of years under their belts it really comes down to what scouting reports tell you.
Tofu Dog | 24-Sep-07 at 12:40 pm | Permalink
Thanks for the response.
e | 24-Sep-07 at 2:34 pm | Permalink
what do you think of Aaron Seuss? He seemed to be lighting it up the first couple of months (.329/.372/.461), then took a nose dive in August and September (.225/.307/.281). Could it have been fatigue?
Brian Oliver | 24-Sep-07 at 2:41 pm | Permalink
Seuss was the last cut for #10, call him 10a. It’s hard to say whether it was fatigue or whether teams figured out how to pitch him. Along with Bass, I’d have to say that Seuss’ performance surprised me the most.
Basil | 24-Sep-07 at 3:01 pm | Permalink
Interestingly, in both ERA and in components, the Vermonsters had essentially a league-average pitching staff. That might not really say anything about the standouts, of course, and it might well be an improvement on prior years.
Brian Oliver | 24-Sep-07 at 3:10 pm | Permalink
Basil - Yes, and it’s even more interesting when you consider how strongly the staff started in aggregate. They regressed to the mean by putting up some ugly outings late {insert sample size discussion here}
Louis J. | 24-Sep-07 at 4:11 pm | Permalink
Brian
Thanks for the information and analysis. Your effort is greatly appreciated. Regardless of everybody’s opinion, it appears that the Nats farm system is beginning to improve. Of course, it will take a few years for new prospects to work their way up which means that the AA and AAA teams will still be behind the curve.
Dick | 24-Sep-07 at 4:39 pm | Permalink
One thing interesting about Willems is that he is a pretty severe sinkerball/groundball pitcher. If he can harness his control and up his strikeouts, he could have a very high upside.
Benji | 24-Sep-07 at 6:07 pm | Permalink
Brian, do you of a website that has good scouting reports?
great work, can’t wait to see an overall prospects list.
My guess is Burgess is #1 maybe marrero
Tofu Dog | 24-Sep-07 at 10:38 pm | Permalink
Keith Law of ESPN had Burgess at 15 and Detwiler 5 in his top 100 posted at the end of May–see Keith Law Archives. Although the meat-heads hate him he used the aggregate MLB scouting reports to derive his own rankings. Baseball America generates independent scouting reports and if you use the two sources together,you have as accurate a prognostication tool as you can have without paying the scouts Mike Rizzo and Dana Brown have working for them.
Louis J. | 25-Sep-07 at 8:23 am | Permalink
Tofu Dog
Maybe, just maybe, the “meat-heads” are the people who are fooled by Keith Law’s “stuff” and actually believe that he knows what he ’s talking about. Maybe some one should be asking, Why does he put out all of his negative comments? Answer, PUBLICITY!
Tofu Dog | 25-Sep-07 at 2:05 pm | Permalink
LJ, Actually, in Archie Bunker’s universe, Law would qualify as a meat-head. But I think Law does a good job in covering young talent. He just goes overboard in putting youth at too high a premium, which is probably why he is not in Toronto anymore. Most of his disdain for the Nationals has been targeted at Bowden and many folks who work in GM offices around the country seem to share that opinion. You see it pop up in a lot of articles on the web. Law was one of the only people who took the final scouting reports before the draft and put together a list from them and I think if fans are interested in the amateur draft, he is a good resource.
Louis J. | 25-Sep-07 at 3:53 pm | Permalink
Tofu Dog
Bowden also makes me uncomfortable. I don’t trust him either and I’m not sure Kasten trusts him. But Kasten knows that Bowden has the ear of Mark Lerner and he’s doing a good job so far. Therefore, Kasten knows that this not the time to rock the boat and replace him. BUT, the fact that Law doesn’t like Bowden would make his evaluation of Nats prospects and trades extremely bias and worthless. In that respect, I put him in the same category as Bowden. I don’t trust him either.
While I don’t trust Bowden, I must admit that things have improved for the franchise. The lineup has been improved with Kearns, Lopez, Guzman, Young, Belliard, Jimenez, Flores, Wily Mo and the draft choices like Zimmerman, Maxwell, Marerro, Detwiler, Willems, Gibson, Smoker, McGeary, Burgess, etc., etc., etc. And, where did he find the pitchers that no other GM found? And, lets not forget the one year of Alfonso Soriano.
Finally, some GM don’t like him because their incompetent such as the Cincinnati GM who traded away Kearns, Lopez, Wagner to Nats and Wily Mo to Boston while that same GM took Cincinnati from a playoff team in July,2006 to a team with only 71 wins in Sept, 2007! Bowden made the guy look like a fool!! Remember, in the end, the Nats unloaded Vidro and his $15 mil contract for Wil Mo, Langerhans and $2.5 mil cash to Seattle. That will make some GM jealous!
Tom | 25-Sep-07 at 8:50 pm | Permalink
Brian,
As usual a great evaluation job!
Everyone remember at this level the evaluation is all about youth and potential and very little to do with actual performance. I believe Baseball Perpectus doesn’t do its major league projections until a player has AA playing time. BP believes performance at AA level is the first relavent playing experience that actually translates to projectable ML performance.
So we are still in the potential area here.
Mark | 25-Sep-07 at 10:33 pm | Permalink
The best line I ever heard about Bowden was after he had been here a few months; that he was a brilliant mind who would do great things as long as he had adult supervision. I think events have borne that out so far– lots of terrific moves, but he’s been unable to do his out-of-control thing in the front office that he’s shown in the past.
Suns Fan | 26-Sep-07 at 2:03 am | Permalink
I think King would’ve been better off if he had been assigned to Vermont in the beginning. As it was, he came to Hagerstown for a month, then went back to rookie ball for most of the season, and spent a few weeks in Vermont (where he really needed to be). It’ll be interesting to see if there’s a difference next year (assuming he starts at Hagerstown). He has some potential.
Bob King | 26-Sep-07 at 12:00 pm | Permalink
King’s “bad” experience in Hagerstown was a valuable lesson and learning tool for him. The same can be said for his “Rookie” ball season in Vierra, and his finish in Vermont. These lessons MUST be learned by experiencing them…and he did just that. Most importantly, he stayed healthy for most of the entire season (his longest season prior to this was a 30 game High School season), and is still a very confident and determined player. Remember that when he started in Hagerstown he had not played a “live” game in almost 10 months! Becoming a professional baseball player is more of a marathon than a sprint…patience!
Suns Fan | 26-Sep-07 at 12:19 pm | Permalink
This is true. Though I may wear a helmet when he bats next year (I was almost it by a lost bat of his that flew into the stands). More Pine Tar! (which he did right after he got the bat back from the kid that picked it up) :).
Even at Hagerstown, King showed some potential. Felipe Lopez had a similar first month here (.185). The Blue Jays kept him here for the rest of the season, and he improved. The thing about the minor leagues is that sometimes you can’t personally see the improvements because guys get sent elsewhere. Of the people on the Suns for the whole season, Michael Martinez was probably the guy that improved the most from start to finish. Leonard Davis (gone for the last month) also improved his defense–and learned a new position–during the season. Cabral did well the entire season, which tells me maybe he should’ve been at Potomac.
I think that there are other players that were on the Suns–Patrick Nichols foremost amongst them–that would really improve if they were given more playing time. Nichols has a great arm, and he is an excellent clutch hitter. If he could just take what he does in the clutch, and do that at every at-bat, he’d be one heck of a player.
Suns Fan | 26-Sep-07 at 12:22 pm | Permalink
Also, the transition to wood bats shouldn’t be overlooked when it comes to hitting (and flying bats for that matter too). It’s a difficult transition.
Tofu Dog | 27-Sep-07 at 10:08 am | Permalink
Baseball America’s Vermont League Top Twenty was posted this morning. Zimmerman–5th, Gibson–9th, and Willems–11th. That makes more sense to me. It is early yet and Brad Meyer got the bump up to Potomac, but I think Zimmerman is their best right hander after Balester and that could change as well. Thanks for the thoughtful response LJ. It was interesting to see Bowden at the game last night with an organization woman instead of some bimbo blond. She was carrying a score sheet and the only pair she had were glasses. A nice change from last season, but I would feel better if the Lerners moved him into the Mall Development side of things.
Louis J. | 27-Sep-07 at 3:30 pm | Permalink
Sun Fan
I’m interested in hearing more from you about the prospects at Hagerstown this year and next year. I’m planning on making a few trips to Hagerstown next year to see some of the new faces. Maybe we can stay in touch.
I’ll be watching Cabral, Martinez, Davis and others when they get to Potomac
Louis J. | 27-Sep-07 at 3:49 pm | Permalink
Tofu Dog
I beginning to believe that Jordan Zimmermann has the potential to be the next John Lannan and move up to AAA in one year if his secondary stuff improves in the off-season. Balester is a “surfer dude” from SoCal and discipline may be a challenge. He looked good in the FUTURES GAME at the All-Star game - a tall, lean power pitcher. If he had better control, he would be a definite 2008 potential starter for the Nationals and a lot of fun to watch.
While we may have our comments about Bowden, let’s not get to personal about girl-friends and blondes. Some of us may be married to one. Remember, the “Miracle Worker” has found some great cast-offs for us (like Belliard, Young, Jimenez, Fick, Redding & Hanrahan) and the last of which is Wily Mo who is now hitting breaking pitches, has decreased his strikeouts, is a better outfielder than I thought with good speed and good arm. Where the H—- would the Nationals be without these players? There all looking mar-vel-ous!!
Suns Fan | 28-Sep-07 at 4:29 pm | Permalink
Martinez was a little old for the South Atlantic League (23, I think). But he has great range and excellent speed. He batted lead off for the Suns for the last few months, and did really well in that role (raised his average 30 points). I think he finished hitting around .250 with 21 doubles, 3 triples, 0 homers, and 32 RBI. He had 13 stolen bases (16 attempts). For the first half, he was pretty much a bench player. Once he started playing every day, I think he hit close to .270.
The downside is that he, even considering the difficulties of Municipal Stadium, made lots of errors. Though he’d go from making an error one play to making a spectacular play the next day. I think he should be moved up to Potomac.