<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.1.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rule 5 Draft - Mining for Names (Braves)</title>
	<link>http://farmauthority.dcsportsnet.com/2007/11/30/rule-5-draft-mining-for-names/</link>
	<description>We cannot always build the future for our youth, but we can build our youth for the future - FDR</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 20:30:14 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Louis J.</title>
		<link>http://farmauthority.dcsportsnet.com/2007/11/30/rule-5-draft-mining-for-names/#comment-44094</link>
		<author>Louis J.</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 14:55:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://farmauthority.dcsportsnet.com/2007/11/30/rule-5-draft-mining-for-names/#comment-44094</guid>
					<description>&lt;p&gt;Brian
Good investigative work for us....Why doesn't MLB want to make the Rule 5 names public? I assume the list is available for the teams and the players know they were not protected. BA had the list and gave us a highlight of some Rule 5 players. So what's the secret they're trying to protect?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brian<br />
Good investigative work for us&#8230;.Why doesn&#8217;t MLB want to make the Rule 5 names public? I assume the list is available for the teams and the players know they were not protected. BA had the list and gave us a highlight of some Rule 5 players. So what&#8217;s the secret they&#8217;re trying to protect?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mitch</title>
		<link>http://farmauthority.dcsportsnet.com/2007/11/30/rule-5-draft-mining-for-names/#comment-44132</link>
		<author>Mitch</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 23:56:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://farmauthority.dcsportsnet.com/2007/11/30/rule-5-draft-mining-for-names/#comment-44132</guid>
					<description>&lt;p&gt;More of what makes baseball great, speculation. Good work on digging the info, I agree with you that Loadenthal has some solid stats and is teetering on making the next step.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More of what makes baseball great, speculation. Good work on digging the info, I agree with you that Loadenthal has some solid stats and is teetering on making the next step.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
