<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.1.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: UPDATED - Schneider/Church for Milledge</title>
	<link>http://farmauthority.dcsportsnet.com/2007/11/30/schneiderchurch-for-milledge/</link>
	<description>We cannot always build the future for our youth, but we can build our youth for the future - FDR</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 22:41:15 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan Sullivan</title>
		<link>http://farmauthority.dcsportsnet.com/2007/11/30/schneiderchurch-for-milledge/#comment-44105</link>
		<author>Ryan Sullivan</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 19:25:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://farmauthority.dcsportsnet.com/2007/11/30/schneiderchurch-for-milledge/#comment-44105</guid>
					<description>&lt;p&gt;I honestly think this is the happiest I have been about anything the Nats have done since that day they announced baseball was coming back in Washington.  Milledge is exactly the type of player we need, and we gave away an overrated backup/platoon type catcher and a solid 4th OF, weak 3rd OF...&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Well done Bowden, now make the same type of move with Cordero-&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I honestly think this is the happiest I have been about anything the Nats have done since that day they announced baseball was coming back in Washington.  Milledge is exactly the type of player we need, and we gave away an overrated backup/platoon type catcher and a solid 4th OF, weak 3rd OF&#8230;</p>
<p>Well done Bowden, now make the same type of move with Cordero-</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Louis J.</title>
		<link>http://farmauthority.dcsportsnet.com/2007/11/30/schneiderchurch-for-milledge/#comment-44110</link>
		<author>Louis J.</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 19:52:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://farmauthority.dcsportsnet.com/2007/11/30/schneiderchurch-for-milledge/#comment-44110</guid>
					<description>&lt;p&gt;WOW, WOW!!! Lastings Milledge!!!! He's a legitimate CF and probably our leadoff man for 2008. Wily Mo(LF)(R/R), Milledge (CF)(R/R) &#38; Kearns (RF)(R/R) in the outfield. Ryan Church was expendable and Flores made Schneider's weak bat a problem.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Bowden is filling holes but he still needs a LHH power bat for the No. 6/7 spot in the lineup AND a least one more starting pitcher. It interesting seeing Bowden pick up young talent and/or veteran players with very little in resources or quality trading talent.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WOW, WOW!!! Lastings Milledge!!!! He&#8217;s a legitimate CF and probably our leadoff man for 2008. Wily Mo(LF)(R/R), Milledge (CF)(R/R) &amp; Kearns (RF)(R/R) in the outfield. Ryan Church was expendable and Flores made Schneider&#8217;s weak bat a problem.</p>
<p>Bowden is filling holes but he still needs a LHH power bat for the No. 6/7 spot in the lineup AND a least one more starting pitcher. It interesting seeing Bowden pick up young talent and/or veteran players with very little in resources or quality trading talent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tofu Dog</title>
		<link>http://farmauthority.dcsportsnet.com/2007/11/30/schneiderchurch-for-milledge/#comment-44119</link>
		<author>Tofu Dog</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 20:55:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://farmauthority.dcsportsnet.com/2007/11/30/schneiderchurch-for-milledge/#comment-44119</guid>
					<description>&lt;p&gt;Louis J. Keith Law is a big fan of this one, calling it the worst move the Mets have made since they traded Kazmir to the Rays.  We got everybody on our side on this one.  And it is a hell of a lot better than the rumored trade for Elijah Dukes.  Milledge's attitude problems are not likely to land him in jail where it is even harder to hit .300 than in the manager's doghouse.  Now they can go into the Rule 5 and take a catcher or Brian Barton as a fifth outfielder.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Louis J. Keith Law is a big fan of this one, calling it the worst move the Mets have made since they traded Kazmir to the Rays.  We got everybody on our side on this one.  And it is a hell of a lot better than the rumored trade for Elijah Dukes.  Milledge&#8217;s attitude problems are not likely to land him in jail where it is even harder to hit .300 than in the manager&#8217;s doghouse.  Now they can go into the Rule 5 and take a catcher or Brian Barton as a fifth outfielder.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg</title>
		<link>http://farmauthority.dcsportsnet.com/2007/11/30/schneiderchurch-for-milledge/#comment-44120</link>
		<author>Greg</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 21:25:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://farmauthority.dcsportsnet.com/2007/11/30/schneiderchurch-for-milledge/#comment-44120</guid>
					<description>&lt;p&gt;Really like this move.  Hopefully this will solve our CF questions for the next few years.  And hopefully Lastings relationship with Manny will smooth over any of the attitude questions.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really like this move.  Hopefully this will solve our CF questions for the next few years.  And hopefully Lastings relationship with Manny will smooth over any of the attitude questions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Louis J.</title>
		<link>http://farmauthority.dcsportsnet.com/2007/11/30/schneiderchurch-for-milledge/#comment-44121</link>
		<author>Louis J.</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 21:49:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://farmauthority.dcsportsnet.com/2007/11/30/schneiderchurch-for-milledge/#comment-44121</guid>
					<description>&lt;p&gt;Tofu&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Keith Law likes the trade!! Wow, the guy has some smarts after all....
Remember, the Mets still have Johnny Estrada (S/R) who was paid $3.4M last year and is arbitration eligible for 2008. With Schnieder at $4.9M a year, the Mets will not keep both Schnieder &#38; Estrada. They may non-tender Estrada who would become a free agent at which time the Nationals can attempt to pick him up (1/2 yrs) but it will cost them $3.7 a year.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;What does the trade mean for Maxwell? His move to the Nats is now blocked by Milledge, Pena and Kearns. Could be part of a trade?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tofu</p>
<p>Keith Law likes the trade!! Wow, the guy has some smarts after all&#8230;.<br />
Remember, the Mets still have Johnny Estrada (S/R) who was paid $3.4M last year and is arbitration eligible for 2008. With Schnieder at $4.9M a year, the Mets will not keep both Schnieder &amp; Estrada. They may non-tender Estrada who would become a free agent at which time the Nationals can attempt to pick him up (1/2 yrs) but it will cost them $3.7 a year.</p>
<p>What does the trade mean for Maxwell? His move to the Nats is now blocked by Milledge, Pena and Kearns. Could be part of a trade?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will</title>
		<link>http://farmauthority.dcsportsnet.com/2007/11/30/schneiderchurch-for-milledge/#comment-44122</link>
		<author>Will</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 21:56:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://farmauthority.dcsportsnet.com/2007/11/30/schneiderchurch-for-milledge/#comment-44122</guid>
					<description>&lt;p&gt;I like this move too.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I don't think Flores is ready.  He will need some time in the minors.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Tofu Dog: are you talking about Brian Barton from the Indians?  I saw him play several times and I think he could start. I think he is much better then a 5th outfielder.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like this move too.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think Flores is ready.  He will need some time in the minors.</p>
<p>Tofu Dog: are you talking about Brian Barton from the Indians?  I saw him play several times and I think he could start. I think he is much better then a 5th outfielder.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tofu Dog</title>
		<link>http://farmauthority.dcsportsnet.com/2007/11/30/schneiderchurch-for-milledge/#comment-44127</link>
		<author>Tofu Dog</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 23:08:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://farmauthority.dcsportsnet.com/2007/11/30/schneiderchurch-for-milledge/#comment-44127</guid>
					<description>&lt;p&gt;If the Nats can get Barton, he can fill in everywhere like Church did, probably play better defense as well.  I have some friends from Cleveland that are pretty high on him too.  I think Maxwell may end up being a Barton kind of player too if he can make consistent contact.  Maybe Maxwell blossoms this year in Harrisburg and does more, but I still think he will do well to develop into a good fourth outfielder who can steal a base and fill more than Church's role.  I think the next shoe to drop is the interesting one.  Will we trade any of the three relievers, Cordero, Rauch or Ayala, and can Bowden keep getting interesting talent in return?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the Nats can get Barton, he can fill in everywhere like Church did, probably play better defense as well.  I have some friends from Cleveland that are pretty high on him too.  I think Maxwell may end up being a Barton kind of player too if he can make consistent contact.  Maybe Maxwell blossoms this year in Harrisburg and does more, but I still think he will do well to develop into a good fourth outfielder who can steal a base and fill more than Church&#8217;s role.  I think the next shoe to drop is the interesting one.  Will we trade any of the three relievers, Cordero, Rauch or Ayala, and can Bowden keep getting interesting talent in return?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Louis J.</title>
		<link>http://farmauthority.dcsportsnet.com/2007/11/30/schneiderchurch-for-milledge/#comment-44141</link>
		<author>Louis J.</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2007 02:11:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://farmauthority.dcsportsnet.com/2007/11/30/schneiderchurch-for-milledge/#comment-44141</guid>
					<description>&lt;p&gt;Tofu Dog&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Bowden said he was working on this trade for 4 months. We know he was working on the Wily Mo trade for 2-3 months. We don't know what other deals he's been working on. In a radio interview, he indicated that while the Nats might not be signing any big free agents, they could be involved in trades as a way to improve the team.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Therefore, it would not surprise me that he would trade Cordero or Rauch for a starting pitcher, probably young veteran (age 25-27) type since they have enough of their own young prospective starters. The Giants, Bewers &#38; Rangers need a starter AND the Cubs, Indians &#38; Tigers may decide to invest in a younger closer. The deals could revolve around the secondary players in the deals. Of course, there's always Lopez to talk about.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Next week's winter meetings may be VERY INTERESTING!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tofu Dog</p>
<p>Bowden said he was working on this trade for 4 months. We know he was working on the Wily Mo trade for 2-3 months. We don&#8217;t know what other deals he&#8217;s been working on. In a radio interview, he indicated that while the Nats might not be signing any big free agents, they could be involved in trades as a way to improve the team.</p>
<p>Therefore, it would not surprise me that he would trade Cordero or Rauch for a starting pitcher, probably young veteran (age 25-27) type since they have enough of their own young prospective starters. The Giants, Bewers &amp; Rangers need a starter AND the Cubs, Indians &amp; Tigers may decide to invest in a younger closer. The deals could revolve around the secondary players in the deals. Of course, there&#8217;s always Lopez to talk about.</p>
<p>Next week&#8217;s winter meetings may be VERY INTERESTING!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Let Teddy Win!</title>
		<link>http://farmauthority.dcsportsnet.com/2007/11/30/schneiderchurch-for-milledge/#comment-44152</link>
		<author>Let Teddy Win!</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2007 04:31:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://farmauthority.dcsportsnet.com/2007/11/30/schneiderchurch-for-milledge/#comment-44152</guid>
					<description>&lt;p&gt;Has anybody noticed that the Nats just traded their only left-handed starting position players, on the eve of moving into a park with a cozy right field?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Has anybody noticed that the Nats just traded their only left-handed starting position players, on the eve of moving into a park with a cozy right field?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hartmanbirge</title>
		<link>http://farmauthority.dcsportsnet.com/2007/11/30/schneiderchurch-for-milledge/#comment-44155</link>
		<author>hartmanbirge</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2007 06:31:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://farmauthority.dcsportsnet.com/2007/11/30/schneiderchurch-for-milledge/#comment-44155</guid>
					<description>&lt;p&gt;Hi gang.  I just LOVE this move....  We are getting a kid who has potential to be a 30/30 guy and play a very good center field.  I rhetorically ask - is it better to make the trade we just did for Milledge or is it better to pay a gazillion bucks for Tori Hunter?  Love it! Love it! Love it!!  This solves a whole slew of problems I think....  Now Wily Mo is the unquestioned starting LF.  This is good for us and bad news for the rest of the league.  We have a young stud in CF.  Kearns is home in right.  We will now have a very good defensive outfield with Kearns and Milledge patrolling the RF/CF gaps.  Our left handed bat is going to have to play 1b which is a tad disconcerting for 2010 when Marrero will be pushing his way to DC..  This now creates a few "needs" for Bowden to address...  he has to find a 4th outfielder now.... and a left handed one with power at that...  he has to find a catcher - preferably left handed...  if Lopez could return to the bygone power days he had in Cinci this would help from the left hand perspective a lot...  Tally it all up.... Bowden has acquired Wily Mo, Kearns, Lopez, Milledge, and Young - for pieces that just didn't fit.  And the Ryan Church "this will be good for me" show is out the door...  excellent!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi gang.  I just LOVE this move&#8230;.  We are getting a kid who has potential to be a 30/30 guy and play a very good center field.  I rhetorically ask - is it better to make the trade we just did for Milledge or is it better to pay a gazillion bucks for Tori Hunter?  Love it! Love it! Love it!!  This solves a whole slew of problems I think&#8230;.  Now Wily Mo is the unquestioned starting LF.  This is good for us and bad news for the rest of the league.  We have a young stud in CF.  Kearns is home in right.  We will now have a very good defensive outfield with Kearns and Milledge patrolling the RF/CF gaps.  Our left handed bat is going to have to play 1b which is a tad disconcerting for 2010 when Marrero will be pushing his way to DC..  This now creates a few &#8220;needs&#8221; for Bowden to address&#8230;  he has to find a 4th outfielder now&#8230;. and a left handed one with power at that&#8230;  he has to find a catcher - preferably left handed&#8230;  if Lopez could return to the bygone power days he had in Cinci this would help from the left hand perspective a lot&#8230;  Tally it all up&#8230;. Bowden has acquired Wily Mo, Kearns, Lopez, Milledge, and Young - for pieces that just didn&#8217;t fit.  And the Ryan Church &#8220;this will be good for me&#8221; show is out the door&#8230;  excellent!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hartmanbirge</title>
		<link>http://farmauthority.dcsportsnet.com/2007/11/30/schneiderchurch-for-milledge/#comment-44170</link>
		<author>hartmanbirge</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2007 10:39:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://farmauthority.dcsportsnet.com/2007/11/30/schneiderchurch-for-milledge/#comment-44170</guid>
					<description>&lt;p&gt;Sorry..... can't help it - so I need to write more.  I've thought of some more impact that this trade implies.  This is potentially great news for Cory Casto.  He is left handed and plays multiple positions.  I have to now think that Church's departure opens a door for him.  He can substitute in the OF and be a left handed bat in the lineup... he can also spell Zimmerman at 3b and Lopez at 2b.  Because of his versatility Casto could get quite a few ABs through the year.  Second, if Nick Johnson returns to health, then Young can also fill-in in LF as a left-handed bat.  Longer term, Burgess bats left...  So when Marrero arrives in DC it should probably coincide with Burgess.  Burgess will be either in RF or LF.... Kearns will have probably played out his contract at that point...  That gives you a power left-handed bat in the middle of the lineup...  If I had to hazard a guess, I would say that Jimbo is looking for a left-handed hitting catcher right now - perhaps frantically.   Another thing I would love to see is that the Nats acquire a young left-handed hitting SS with power - that would really help resolve the rh and lh imbalance we have.  Guzman is just a short term answer - we have him only one more season..  Overall, this trade just resolves a lot of issues for our OF.  Maxwell?  I think you can kiss him goodbye... he will never break into our OF now... Milledge is a far better prospect and is younger to boot.  I doubt that Maxwell's arm holds up in RF...perhaps LF but I'd vastly prefer Wily Mo and his prodigious pwer...  Maybe Mad Max can eventually serve as a toolsy 4th OF?  And if Jimbo can find a 2b or SS who can lead off that would just be the icing on the cake...  I wonder where Milledge would rank in the Baseball America top 10 Nats prospects were he eligible...  somewhere btwn #1 and #3 I'd think...&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry&#8230;.. can&#8217;t help it - so I need to write more.  I&#8217;ve thought of some more impact that this trade implies.  This is potentially great news for Cory Casto.  He is left handed and plays multiple positions.  I have to now think that Church&#8217;s departure opens a door for him.  He can substitute in the OF and be a left handed bat in the lineup&#8230; he can also spell Zimmerman at 3b and Lopez at 2b.  Because of his versatility Casto could get quite a few ABs through the year.  Second, if Nick Johnson returns to health, then Young can also fill-in in LF as a left-handed bat.  Longer term, Burgess bats left&#8230;  So when Marrero arrives in DC it should probably coincide with Burgess.  Burgess will be either in RF or LF&#8230;. Kearns will have probably played out his contract at that point&#8230;  That gives you a power left-handed bat in the middle of the lineup&#8230;  If I had to hazard a guess, I would say that Jimbo is looking for a left-handed hitting catcher right now - perhaps frantically.   Another thing I would love to see is that the Nats acquire a young left-handed hitting SS with power - that would really help resolve the rh and lh imbalance we have.  Guzman is just a short term answer - we have him only one more season..  Overall, this trade just resolves a lot of issues for our OF.  Maxwell?  I think you can kiss him goodbye&#8230; he will never break into our OF now&#8230; Milledge is a far better prospect and is younger to boot.  I doubt that Maxwell&#8217;s arm holds up in RF&#8230;perhaps LF but I&#8217;d vastly prefer Wily Mo and his prodigious pwer&#8230;  Maybe Mad Max can eventually serve as a toolsy 4th OF?  And if Jimbo can find a 2b or SS who can lead off that would just be the icing on the cake&#8230;  I wonder where Milledge would rank in the Baseball America top 10 Nats prospects were he eligible&#8230;  somewhere btwn #1 and #3 I&#8217;d think&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jane</title>
		<link>http://farmauthority.dcsportsnet.com/2007/11/30/schneiderchurch-for-milledge/#comment-44181</link>
		<author>Jane</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2007 14:39:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://farmauthority.dcsportsnet.com/2007/11/30/schneiderchurch-for-milledge/#comment-44181</guid>
					<description>&lt;p&gt;I disagree with this move.  I thought the Nationals were interested in keeping "home grown talent".&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I disagree with this move.  I thought the Nationals were interested in keeping &#8220;home grown talent&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Oliver</title>
		<link>http://farmauthority.dcsportsnet.com/2007/11/30/schneiderchurch-for-milledge/#comment-44189</link>
		<author>Brian Oliver</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2007 15:38:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://farmauthority.dcsportsnet.com/2007/11/30/schneiderchurch-for-milledge/#comment-44189</guid>
					<description>&lt;p&gt;Jane - For completeness sake, Church is not homegrown, he was acquired as a minor leaguer from the Cleveland Indians.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The Nationals are not a near term candidate (next 1-3 years) to compete for a World Series and by the time they likely will be ready, Schneider &#38; Church will be on the back end of their careers and most likely would not be part of the roster (age or dollars). Milledge on the other hand will only be 23 years old next year and should be entering what would be his prime years when they are ready to compete.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jane - For completeness sake, Church is not homegrown, he was acquired as a minor leaguer from the Cleveland Indians.</p>
<p>The Nationals are not a near term candidate (next 1-3 years) to compete for a World Series and by the time they likely will be ready, Schneider &amp; Church will be on the back end of their careers and most likely would not be part of the roster (age or dollars). Milledge on the other hand will only be 23 years old next year and should be entering what would be his prime years when they are ready to compete.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Louis J.</title>
		<link>http://farmauthority.dcsportsnet.com/2007/11/30/schneiderchurch-for-milledge/#comment-44197</link>
		<author>Louis J.</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2007 16:47:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://farmauthority.dcsportsnet.com/2007/11/30/schneiderchurch-for-milledge/#comment-44197</guid>
					<description>&lt;p&gt;hartmanbirge&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I love the trade too BUT get a hold of you enthusiasm. Casto can play 3B, 1B, LF &#38; RF but not 2B (that experiment at Harrisburg never happened) AND he has to prove he can hit ML pitching especially as PH. The Nats could use a 4th OF/PH who can also play CF just in case (sounds like Langerhans instead of Casto). The Nats have a young LHH outfield prospect in the the minors who could help in 2009 - Marvin Lowrance. His power numbers are getting better and he had a very consistent &#38; good 2007 year.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;They need another LHH starter but where do you play him. Zimmerman, Pena, Kearns and Milledge are RHH starters. Guzman &#38; Lopez are switch-hitters and either Johnson(L) or Young (switch hitter) will play 1B. That leaves the CA position. Flores is a RHH BUT Johnny Estrada of the Mets is a switch-hitting catcher who can fit nicely at Nos. 6-8 in the lineup. I hope Bowden did not outsmart himself by not taking Estrada as part of the Milledge deal and waiting for the Mets to non-tender him which means he can go anywhere.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Finally, I'm not sure they know what to do with Maxwell yet. If he has a big 2008 year he becomes a valuable trading tool but the Nats are not sure what will happen to Pena &#38; Milledge; therefore, it would be nice to have any insurance policy (Maxwell) just in case. But the future with Marrero, Englund, Burgess, etc. is not great.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hartmanbirge</p>
<p>I love the trade too BUT get a hold of you enthusiasm. Casto can play 3B, 1B, LF &amp; RF but not 2B (that experiment at Harrisburg never happened) AND he has to prove he can hit ML pitching especially as PH. The Nats could use a 4th OF/PH who can also play CF just in case (sounds like Langerhans instead of Casto). The Nats have a young LHH outfield prospect in the the minors who could help in 2009 - Marvin Lowrance. His power numbers are getting better and he had a very consistent &amp; good 2007 year.</p>
<p>They need another LHH starter but where do you play him. Zimmerman, Pena, Kearns and Milledge are RHH starters. Guzman &amp; Lopez are switch-hitters and either Johnson(L) or Young (switch hitter) will play 1B. That leaves the CA position. Flores is a RHH BUT Johnny Estrada of the Mets is a switch-hitting catcher who can fit nicely at Nos. 6-8 in the lineup. I hope Bowden did not outsmart himself by not taking Estrada as part of the Milledge deal and waiting for the Mets to non-tender him which means he can go anywhere.</p>
<p>Finally, I&#8217;m not sure they know what to do with Maxwell yet. If he has a big 2008 year he becomes a valuable trading tool but the Nats are not sure what will happen to Pena &amp; Milledge; therefore, it would be nice to have any insurance policy (Maxwell) just in case. But the future with Marrero, Englund, Burgess, etc. is not great.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hartmanbirge</title>
		<link>http://farmauthority.dcsportsnet.com/2007/11/30/schneiderchurch-for-milledge/#comment-44204</link>
		<author>hartmanbirge</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2007 18:01:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://farmauthority.dcsportsnet.com/2007/11/30/schneiderchurch-for-milledge/#comment-44204</guid>
					<description>&lt;p&gt;"get a hold of you enthusiasm."&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Hard to do that..... and I think that Casto can fill in at 2B a game here and there... I never said he should play regularly..  I think that Casto is a commodity due to his versatility and make-up more than his talent or production.  We obviously need a 4th OF now.... who's it going to be?  And he almost HAS to bat left handed..  Brian you were exactly right in your earlier answer and it's why I'm excited.  Schneider and Church will be "pushing the envelope" in three or four years... perhaps they could have been key pieces but I never thought that either quite fit that bill..  Joe Gibbs talks of "core Redskins" and I think it vital to ID that core - that group that will be with you for a decade.  Anybody who isn't in that group in my mind is expendable.  I would also add a few more to the category of good players who just don't quite fit that core - Nick Johnson comes to mind.... Guzman...Lopez.... perhaps Kearns...  and it goes without saying Young and Belliard.  Cordero.  If I had to hazard a guess I'd bet that all of these will be gone within 3 years...but we get a guy with Milledge's upside who is only 22?  In a decade he will be 32 years old.....  I call that a potential franchise cornerstone...&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;get a hold of you enthusiasm.&#8221;</p>
<p>Hard to do that&#8230;.. and I think that Casto can fill in at 2B a game here and there&#8230; I never said he should play regularly..  I think that Casto is a commodity due to his versatility and make-up more than his talent or production.  We obviously need a 4th OF now&#8230;. who&#8217;s it going to be?  And he almost HAS to bat left handed..  Brian you were exactly right in your earlier answer and it&#8217;s why I&#8217;m excited.  Schneider and Church will be &#8220;pushing the envelope&#8221; in three or four years&#8230; perhaps they could have been key pieces but I never thought that either quite fit that bill..  Joe Gibbs talks of &#8220;core Redskins&#8221; and I think it vital to ID that core - that group that will be with you for a decade.  Anybody who isn&#8217;t in that group in my mind is expendable.  I would also add a few more to the category of good players who just don&#8217;t quite fit that core - Nick Johnson comes to mind&#8230;. Guzman&#8230;Lopez&#8230;. perhaps Kearns&#8230;  and it goes without saying Young and Belliard.  Cordero.  If I had to hazard a guess I&#8217;d bet that all of these will be gone within 3 years&#8230;but we get a guy with Milledge&#8217;s upside who is only 22?  In a decade he will be 32 years old&#8230;..  I call that a potential franchise cornerstone&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan</title>
		<link>http://farmauthority.dcsportsnet.com/2007/11/30/schneiderchurch-for-milledge/#comment-44207</link>
		<author>Alan</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2007 19:02:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://farmauthority.dcsportsnet.com/2007/11/30/schneiderchurch-for-milledge/#comment-44207</guid>
					<description>&lt;p&gt;Joel Sherman, in his column in today's NY Post (http://www.nypost.com/), has an analysis of the trade that addresses the pros/cons of both sides.  The whole column is worth reading, but I've pasted in the core paragraphs here....&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;"From his days as the Expos/Nationals GM, Minaya had an insight into Church and Schneider. But in manager Manny Acta, a Mets coach in 2005-06, Washington had an insider glimpse into Milledge. And Acta always felt the Mets clubhouse culture was unfairly critical of Milledge, who really does need to tone down the audacious cockiness."&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;"But Acta knows the positive of that attitude. Milledge is fearless. He was not afraid of the majors or New York. He tends to give too many at-bats away. But not in pressure spots. He loved the big stage. As a former teammate of Milledge said, "he'll win games for you. The better the pitcher, the bigger the moment, the better the player.""&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;"It will be up to Acta to get Milledge to concentrate full-time, and Acta's first year in Washington when he worked with a dubious cast that included Dmitri Young, Felipe Lopez and Robert Fick suggested he was good for this task. And, remember, just a year ago Milledge was being compared to a young Gary Sheffield. So this is a good piece of clay with which to work."&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;"That is the biggest problem with this deal by Minaya. In 2007, Milledge was beset by injury and more bad behavior that the NL talent evaluator said has "turned people off since high school." So Minaya sold Milledge at a low value. My gut says that even if Milledge had another dubious year in 2008, he would still fetch a Schneider/Church level deal."&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joel Sherman, in his column in today&#8217;s NY Post (http://www.nypost.com/), has an analysis of the trade that addresses the pros/cons of both sides.  The whole column is worth reading, but I&#8217;ve pasted in the core paragraphs here&#8230;.</p>
<p>&#8220;From his days as the Expos/Nationals GM, Minaya had an insight into Church and Schneider. But in manager Manny Acta, a Mets coach in 2005-06, Washington had an insider glimpse into Milledge. And Acta always felt the Mets clubhouse culture was unfairly critical of Milledge, who really does need to tone down the audacious cockiness.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;But Acta knows the positive of that attitude. Milledge is fearless. He was not afraid of the majors or New York. He tends to give too many at-bats away. But not in pressure spots. He loved the big stage. As a former teammate of Milledge said, &#8220;he&#8217;ll win games for you. The better the pitcher, the bigger the moment, the better the player.&#8221;"</p>
<p>&#8220;It will be up to Acta to get Milledge to concentrate full-time, and Acta&#8217;s first year in Washington when he worked with a dubious cast that included Dmitri Young, Felipe Lopez and Robert Fick suggested he was good for this task. And, remember, just a year ago Milledge was being compared to a young Gary Sheffield. So this is a good piece of clay with which to work.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;That is the biggest problem with this deal by Minaya. In 2007, Milledge was beset by injury and more bad behavior that the NL talent evaluator said has &#8220;turned people off since high school.&#8221; So Minaya sold Milledge at a low value. My gut says that even if Milledge had another dubious year in 2008, he would still fetch a Schneider/Church level deal.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dick</title>
		<link>http://farmauthority.dcsportsnet.com/2007/11/30/schneiderchurch-for-milledge/#comment-44222</link>
		<author>Dick</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2007 21:46:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://farmauthority.dcsportsnet.com/2007/11/30/schneiderchurch-for-milledge/#comment-44222</guid>
					<description>&lt;p&gt;I can't get over the irony of Milledge's cockiness being a problem for the Mets.    Perhaps a little more attitude like that in their clubhouse would have prevented the Mets folderoo in September!&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Only Omar can make a trade like that!  He would have been better to clear out some more old timers than guys like Lastings.  Thank goodness Omar is on the other side now.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t get over the irony of Milledge&#8217;s cockiness being a problem for the Mets.    Perhaps a little more attitude like that in their clubhouse would have prevented the Mets folderoo in September!</p>
<p>Only Omar can make a trade like that!  He would have been better to clear out some more old timers than guys like Lastings.  Thank goodness Omar is on the other side now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Louis J.</title>
		<link>http://farmauthority.dcsportsnet.com/2007/11/30/schneiderchurch-for-milledge/#comment-44248</link>
		<author>Louis J.</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2007 04:20:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://farmauthority.dcsportsnet.com/2007/11/30/schneiderchurch-for-milledge/#comment-44248</guid>
					<description>&lt;p&gt;If the Nats are looking for a LHH #4 outfielder, Brad Wilkerson is available and he can play LF/CF/1B and still has some pop in his bat. He's a free agent who does not cost them any draft chioces. But Boras is his agent and will ask for some silly long term contract eventhough the Rangers have not offered him arbitration.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the Nats are looking for a LHH #4 outfielder, Brad Wilkerson is available and he can play LF/CF/1B and still has some pop in his bat. He&#8217;s a free agent who does not cost them any draft chioces. But Boras is his agent and will ask for some silly long term contract eventhough the Rangers have not offered him arbitration.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Suns Fan</title>
		<link>http://farmauthority.dcsportsnet.com/2007/11/30/schneiderchurch-for-milledge/#comment-44282</link>
		<author>Suns Fan</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2007 16:56:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://farmauthority.dcsportsnet.com/2007/11/30/schneiderchurch-for-milledge/#comment-44282</guid>
					<description>&lt;p&gt;They could always try Mike Daniel. He had a really good year in Hagerstown/Potomac. I know he doesn't project that well to the majors, but he hits for a high average, and has at least some power. And he's a left-handed hitter. Leonard Davis--if he escapes the rule 5 draft--is another left-handed bat with good power. But it'll probably be a year or two before he's ready for the big leagues.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They could always try Mike Daniel. He had a really good year in Hagerstown/Potomac. I know he doesn&#8217;t project that well to the majors, but he hits for a high average, and has at least some power. And he&#8217;s a left-handed hitter. Leonard Davis&#8211;if he escapes the rule 5 draft&#8211;is another left-handed bat with good power. But it&#8217;ll probably be a year or two before he&#8217;s ready for the big leagues.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dd</title>
		<link>http://farmauthority.dcsportsnet.com/2007/11/30/schneiderchurch-for-milledge/#comment-44285</link>
		<author>dd</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2007 18:36:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://farmauthority.dcsportsnet.com/2007/11/30/schneiderchurch-for-milledge/#comment-44285</guid>
					<description>&lt;p&gt;"The biggest knock on Milledge is his inability to control the strike zone. He’s a free swinger prone to chasing breaking balls out of the zone, and he hasn’t drawn many walks even though pitchers are wary of him."&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Good to see another toolsy guy. A prospect is just that! He hasn't proven his worth yet, but may blossom...or not.
One thing is for sure, the Nats will be among the leaders in strikeouts, with Pena, Milledge, Kearns and Lopez. Only Kearns gets walks. Hopefully there will be lots of key homers.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The biggest knock on Milledge is his inability to control the strike zone. He’s a free swinger prone to chasing breaking balls out of the zone, and he hasn’t drawn many walks even though pitchers are wary of him.&#8221;</p>
<p>Good to see another toolsy guy. A prospect is just that! He hasn&#8217;t proven his worth yet, but may blossom&#8230;or not.<br />
One thing is for sure, the Nats will be among the leaders in strikeouts, with Pena, Milledge, Kearns and Lopez. Only Kearns gets walks. Hopefully there will be lots of key homers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dick</title>
		<link>http://farmauthority.dcsportsnet.com/2007/11/30/schneiderchurch-for-milledge/#comment-44290</link>
		<author>Dick</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2007 19:33:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://farmauthority.dcsportsnet.com/2007/11/30/schneiderchurch-for-milledge/#comment-44290</guid>
					<description>&lt;p&gt;Louis J:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Interesting on Brad Wilkerson.  Unless he has changed since he left, he can't hit right handed pitching.  He only hits left handers.  I used to dislike him but would love it when the opposition brought in lefty's to pitch to him.  He would kill 'em, especially Bobby Cox and the Braves.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Louis J:</p>
<p>Interesting on Brad Wilkerson.  Unless he has changed since he left, he can&#8217;t hit right handed pitching.  He only hits left handers.  I used to dislike him but would love it when the opposition brought in lefty&#8217;s to pitch to him.  He would kill &#8216;em, especially Bobby Cox and the Braves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jane</title>
		<link>http://farmauthority.dcsportsnet.com/2007/11/30/schneiderchurch-for-milledge/#comment-44300</link>
		<author>Jane</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2007 21:01:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://farmauthority.dcsportsnet.com/2007/11/30/schneiderchurch-for-milledge/#comment-44300</guid>
					<description>&lt;p&gt;For clarification sake, I was talking about Brian Schneider being "home grown" (not Ryan Church).&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For clarification sake, I was talking about Brian Schneider being &#8220;home grown&#8221; (not Ryan Church).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hartmanbirge</title>
		<link>http://farmauthority.dcsportsnet.com/2007/11/30/schneiderchurch-for-milledge/#comment-44339</link>
		<author>Hartmanbirge</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 13:41:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://farmauthority.dcsportsnet.com/2007/11/30/schneiderchurch-for-milledge/#comment-44339</guid>
					<description>&lt;p&gt;Well we may indeed leade the league in strikeouts but we do have guys in Zimmerman and Johnson who get on base a lot.  In the minors Milledge's OBP wasn't all that bad.  I expect improvement in Pena's now that he seems to be learning to go "inside out" with his swing.  In my mind the huge what-if for the regular lineup is up the middle.  Of course catcher is a big qustion.  I don't get impression management is sold on Lopez.  Guzman is brittle and inconsistent (one year he's a gimme out the next he's over .300 - which will it be?).  We have Guzman only one more season and really no one pushing towards big leagues that soon.  Desmond?  Would be a shock.  Far more questions than answers here.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well we may indeed leade the league in strikeouts but we do have guys in Zimmerman and Johnson who get on base a lot.  In the minors Milledge&#8217;s OBP wasn&#8217;t all that bad.  I expect improvement in Pena&#8217;s now that he seems to be learning to go &#8220;inside out&#8221; with his swing.  In my mind the huge what-if for the regular lineup is up the middle.  Of course catcher is a big qustion.  I don&#8217;t get impression management is sold on Lopez.  Guzman is brittle and inconsistent (one year he&#8217;s a gimme out the next he&#8217;s over .300 - which will it be?).  We have Guzman only one more season and really no one pushing towards big leagues that soon.  Desmond?  Would be a shock.  Far more questions than answers here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
