<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.1.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: MLB Draft Rules Changes</title>
	<link>http://farmauthority.dcsportsnet.com/2008/04/25/mlb-draft-rules-changes/</link>
	<description>We cannot always build the future for our youth, but we can build our youth for the future - FDR</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 05:44:08 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Tofu Dog</title>
		<link>http://farmauthority.dcsportsnet.com/2008/04/25/mlb-draft-rules-changes/#comment-65919</link>
		<author>Tofu Dog</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 17:43:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://farmauthority.dcsportsnet.com/2008/04/25/mlb-draft-rules-changes/#comment-65919</guid>
					<description>&lt;p&gt;I thought on what is a slow day I would go back to your affinity for Buster Posey.  I see why now that I look up his stats at FSU this season.  But BA in discussing the Rays thoughts on their first pick are very conscious of what their system currently contains.  They are rich in pitching and corner IF so they might take Posey since they are weak at Catcher.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I believe that makes sense and therefore cannot see the Nationals failing to address their lack of middle infield depth in the minors and the imminent departures in the majors as well.  They cannot draft the best catcher available without regard to their existing stock of players, its strengths and weaknesses.  Flores may not be Jorge Posada as some pundit predicted after last season, but he projects pretty well both offensively and defensively.  We have Montz starting to come on and while he may be a long shot, we have options with higher upside than Ian Desmond's at the position.  I don't pretend to know whether Gordon Beckham is the next coming of Matt LaPorta or not, but he is very convincing.  I cannot see how we can pass on the best middle infielder in the draft at #9 and a college player who is close as well.  The needs within the system have to figure into the equation and pitching--maybe a closer--and middle infield are the glaring weaknesses as I see them.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought on what is a slow day I would go back to your affinity for Buster Posey.  I see why now that I look up his stats at FSU this season.  But BA in discussing the Rays thoughts on their first pick are very conscious of what their system currently contains.  They are rich in pitching and corner IF so they might take Posey since they are weak at Catcher.</p>
<p>I believe that makes sense and therefore cannot see the Nationals failing to address their lack of middle infield depth in the minors and the imminent departures in the majors as well.  They cannot draft the best catcher available without regard to their existing stock of players, its strengths and weaknesses.  Flores may not be Jorge Posada as some pundit predicted after last season, but he projects pretty well both offensively and defensively.  We have Montz starting to come on and while he may be a long shot, we have options with higher upside than Ian Desmond&#8217;s at the position.  I don&#8217;t pretend to know whether Gordon Beckham is the next coming of Matt LaPorta or not, but he is very convincing.  I cannot see how we can pass on the best middle infielder in the draft at #9 and a college player who is close as well.  The needs within the system have to figure into the equation and pitching&#8211;maybe a closer&#8211;and middle infield are the glaring weaknesses as I see them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Oliver</title>
		<link>http://farmauthority.dcsportsnet.com/2008/04/25/mlb-draft-rules-changes/#comment-65922</link>
		<author>Brian Oliver</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 17:54:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://farmauthority.dcsportsnet.com/2008/04/25/mlb-draft-rules-changes/#comment-65922</guid>
					<description>&lt;p&gt;TD - I understand your point and if either of the Beckhams are there (Tim or Gordon), it would be tempting. Tim is a no-brainer if he's sitting out there at #9. While Gordon is a bit more of a debatable point.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Tampa can make the Posey selection because they are significantly deeper at SP and IF than the Nationals. By leaps and bounds. They can afford to make that type of move.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The Nationals are still not very deep. If Brian Matusz or Aaron Crow are sitting out there with Gordon Beckham at #9, I'd hope they'd go after either of the SPs because they are arguably the better players from a scouting standpoint and the Nationals cannot afford the luxury of drafting for need when there are premium players on the board.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TD - I understand your point and if either of the Beckhams are there (Tim or Gordon), it would be tempting. Tim is a no-brainer if he&#8217;s sitting out there at #9. While Gordon is a bit more of a debatable point.</p>
<p>Tampa can make the Posey selection because they are significantly deeper at SP and IF than the Nationals. By leaps and bounds. They can afford to make that type of move.</p>
<p>The Nationals are still not very deep. If Brian Matusz or Aaron Crow are sitting out there with Gordon Beckham at #9, I&#8217;d hope they&#8217;d go after either of the SPs because they are arguably the better players from a scouting standpoint and the Nationals cannot afford the luxury of drafting for need when there are premium players on the board.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tofu Dog</title>
		<link>http://farmauthority.dcsportsnet.com/2008/04/25/mlb-draft-rules-changes/#comment-65939</link>
		<author>Tofu Dog</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 19:57:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://farmauthority.dcsportsnet.com/2008/04/25/mlb-draft-rules-changes/#comment-65939</guid>
					<description>&lt;p&gt;If Matusz or Crow slip to nine, there should be champaign flowing.  Thanks.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Matusz or Crow slip to nine, there should be champaign flowing.  Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chris</title>
		<link>http://farmauthority.dcsportsnet.com/2008/04/25/mlb-draft-rules-changes/#comment-65949</link>
		<author>chris</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 20:22:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://farmauthority.dcsportsnet.com/2008/04/25/mlb-draft-rules-changes/#comment-65949</guid>
					<description>&lt;p&gt;I agree with Brian, you cant compare the Rays drafting style to ours. The Rays have the best and deepest farm system in the league with prospects much closer to the big leagues. Outside of LHPs, the Nats need help everywhere and thus have to take BPA&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Brian, you cant compare the Rays drafting style to ours. The Rays have the best and deepest farm system in the league with prospects much closer to the big leagues. Outside of LHPs, the Nats need help everywhere and thus have to take BPA</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg</title>
		<link>http://farmauthority.dcsportsnet.com/2008/04/25/mlb-draft-rules-changes/#comment-65969</link>
		<author>Greg</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 20:49:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://farmauthority.dcsportsnet.com/2008/04/25/mlb-draft-rules-changes/#comment-65969</guid>
					<description>&lt;p&gt;Well, when you're the Rays it's nice to be drafting in the top 5 for seven of the last nine drafts&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, when you&#8217;re the Rays it&#8217;s nice to be drafting in the top 5 for seven of the last nine drafts</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
